share_log

PNC Process Systems Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603690) Stock Price Dropped 13% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy

PNC Process Systems Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603690) Stock Price Dropped 13% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy

至純科技有限公司(SHSE:603690)上週股價下跌了13%;個人投資者對此不會感到高興
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/18 23:41

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over PNC Process Systems by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 45% ownership
  • Insider ownership in PNC Process Systems is 34%
  • 個人投資者對至純科技的顯著控制意味着公衆在管理和治理相關決策方面有更多的影響力
  • 該公司共有25位投資者,持股比例爲45%。
  • 至純科技的內部持股爲34%

If you want to know who really controls PNC Process Systems Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603690), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 55% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制至純科技有限公司(SHSE:603690),你需要查看其股權登記的構成。而持有最大份額的集團是個人投資者,持股比例爲55%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最大利益(或者在市場下滑時損失最多)。

Following a 13% decrease in the stock price last week, individual investors suffered the most losses, but insiders who own 34% stock also took a hit.

在上週股票價格下降13%之後,散戶投資者遭受了最多的損失,但擁有34%股票的內部人員也受到影響。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of PNC Process Systems.

在下圖中,我們聚焦於至純科技的不同股東群體。

big
SHSE:603690 Ownership Breakdown November 19th 2024
SHSE:603690 所有權分佈 2024年11月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PNC Process Systems?

機構持股告訴我們關於至純科技什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

PNC Process Systems already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see PNC Process Systems' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

至純科技已經有機構出現在股份登記中。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這暗示着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票並且喜歡它。但和其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在風險,可能會出現'擁擠交易'。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競爭快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以看到至純科技的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住事情通常還有更多的背景。

big
SHSE:603690 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 19th 2024
上證所:603690 2024年11月19日的收益和營業收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in PNC Process Systems. With a 27% stake, CEO Yuan Jiang is the largest shareholder. With 3.3% and 2.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Long Ying Lu and Hao Zhao are the second and third largest shareholders.

我們注意到對至純科技的對沖基金沒有顯著投資。 創始人兼首席執行官袁江持有27%的股份,是最大的股東。 其中,長穎路和趙浩分別持有3.3%和2.5%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股東。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

儘管有必要研究公司的機構持股數據,但研究分析師的情緒也是有道理的,以了解風向。這隻股票有一些分析師的覆蓋,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵蓋面的空間。

Insider Ownership Of PNC Process Systems

至純科技的內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of PNC Process Systems Co., Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥3.5b stake in this CN¥10b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據表明,管理層擁有至純科技有限公司合理比例的股份。很有意思的是,管理層在這個100億人民幣的業務中持有35億人民幣的實質性股份。大多數人會認爲,這顯示出與股東的良好一致性,特別是在這樣規模的公司中。您可以點擊這裏查看這些管理層是否有買入或賣出的行爲。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 55% of PNC Process Systems shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,集體持有55%的至純科技股份。這一持股水平使公衆投資者在關鍵政策決定中擁有一定的影響力,例如董事會組成、高管薪酬和股息支付比例。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for PNC Process Systems (1 is concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

我發現了解到底誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正深入了解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 例如,我們發現了至純科技的三個警告信號(有一個令人擔憂!),在此之前你應該了解一下然後再進行投資。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論