Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd's (SHSE:603668) Last Week's 7.2% Decline Must Have Disappointed Individual Investors Who Have a Significant Stake
Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd's (SHSE:603668) Last Week's 7.2% Decline Must Have Disappointed Individual Investors Who Have a Significant Stake
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 42% ownership
- 25% of Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group is held by insiders
- 個人投資者對天馬科技的重大控制意味着公衆在管理和治理相關決策方面有更多影響力。
- 總共有25名投資者擁有該公司的大部分股份,佔股比42%。
- 25%的天馬科技由內部人士持有。
A look at the shareholders of Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd (SHSE:603668) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 58% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看天馬科技集團有限公司(SHSE:603668)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。個人投資者持有58%的股份,是公司中最大股東。也就是說,如果股票上漲,這個群體將獲得最大利益(或者在市場下跌時損失最大)。
Following a 7.2% decrease in the stock price last week, individual investors suffered the most losses, but insiders who own 25% stock also took a hit.
在上週股票價格下降7.2%後,散戶投資者遭受了最多的損失,但持有25%股票的內部人士也遭受了打擊。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解一下福建天馬科技的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group?
機構持有對福建天馬科技的啓示是什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到福建天馬科技確實有機構投資者,而且他們持有公司股票的一部分。這可能表明公司在投資界具有一定的可信度。然而,最好還是小心依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證,因爲他們有時也會出錯。如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,查看福建天馬科技的盈利歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是最重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Qing Tang Chen with 19% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Fujian Tianma Science And Technology Group Co., Ltd., ESOP and Hainan Beiheng Private Equity Fund Management Center (Limited Partnership), with an equal amount of shares to their name at 4.5%.
對沖基金在天馬科技中的持股不多。查看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大股東是首席執行官陳青,持有19%的流通股。第二和第三大股東是福建天馬科技集團有限公司、員工持股計劃和海南北恒股權投資基金管理中心(有限合夥),各自持有4.5%的股份。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究機構持股是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的一種好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現相同的目標。我們目前沒有注意到該股票的任何分析師報告,因此該公司不大可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group
天馬科技的內部股權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥5.9b, and insiders have CN¥1.5b worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
看起來內部人擁有天馬科技有限公司相當大的一部分股份。它的市值僅爲59億人民幣,內部人名下的股份價值達到15億人民幣。這可能表明創始人仍然持有大量股份。您可以點擊這裏查看他們是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 58% of Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有天馬科技58%的股份。這種規模的持股賦予公衆投資者一定的集體權力。他們可以並可能會影響高管薪酬、股息政策和擬議的業務收購決策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Fujian Tianma Science and Technology Group you should be aware of, and 3 of them shouldn't be ignored.
考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解天馬科技,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如:我們發現了4個你應該注意的天馬科技的警告信號,其中3個不應被忽視。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。