These 4 Measures Indicate That Crane (NYSE:CR) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well
These 4 Measures Indicate That Crane (NYSE:CR) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well
The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, Crane Company (NYSE:CR) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
由伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司的查理·芒格支持的外部基金經理李露對此毫不掩飾,他說:「最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受永久的資本損失。」當你檢查公司的資產負債表的風險時,考慮它的資產負債表是很自然的,因爲企業倒閉時通常會涉及債務。重要的是,起重機公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:CR)確實有債務。但是這筆債務是股東關心的問題嗎?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來什麼風險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
當企業無法輕易履行這些義務時,無論是通過自由現金流還是以誘人的價格籌集資金,債務和其他負債就會面臨風險。如果情況變得非常糟糕,貸款人可以控制業務。儘管這種情況不太常見,但我們經常看到負債公司永久稀釋股東,因爲貸款人迫使他們以低價籌集資金。當然,債務的好處是它通常代表廉價資本,尤其是當它用高回報率進行再投資的能力取代了公司的稀釋時。當我們考慮公司對債務的使用時,我們首先要同時考慮現金和債務。
What Is Crane's Net Debt?
Crane 的淨負債是多少?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at September 2024 Crane had debt of US$331.9m, up from US$250.3m in one year. However, it also had US$258.2m in cash, and so its net debt is US$73.7m.
您可以點擊下圖查看更多詳細信息,該圖片顯示,截至2024年9月,Crane的債務爲3.319億美元,高於一年的2.503億美元。但是,它也有2.582億美元的現金,因此其淨負債爲7,370萬美元。
How Healthy Is Crane's Balance Sheet?
Crane 的資產負債表有多健康?
According to the last reported balance sheet, Crane had liabilities of US$572.1m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$502.9m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$258.2m in cash and US$475.8m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$341.0m.
根據上次報告的資產負債表,Crane的負債爲5.721億美元,12個月後到期的負債爲5.029億美元。與此相抵消的是,它有2.582億美元的現金和4.758億美元的應收賬款將在12個月內到期。因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收賬款總額3.41億美元。
Of course, Crane has a market capitalization of US$9.93b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward. But either way, Crane has virtually no net debt, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load!
當然,Crane的市值爲99.3億美元,因此這些負債可能是可以控制的。但是,有足夠的負債,我們肯定會建議股東今後繼續監督資產負債表。但是無論哪種方式,Crane幾乎沒有淨負債,因此可以公平地說,它沒有沉重的債務負擔!
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
我們使用兩個主要比率來告知我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),第二個是其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)覆蓋其利息支出(或簡稱利息保障)的多少倍。因此,我們將債務與收益的關係考慮在內,包括和不包括折舊和攤銷費用。
Crane has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.17. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 17.4 times the size. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. On top of that, Crane grew its EBIT by 64% over the last twelve months, and that growth will make it easier to handle its debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Crane's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
Crane的淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比率很低,僅爲0.17。而且其息稅前利潤很容易彌補其利息支出,是其規模的17.4倍。因此,我們對它超保守的債務使用相當放鬆。最重要的是,Crane在過去十二個月中將其息稅前利潤增長了64%,這種增長將使其更容易處理債務。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但是,未來的收益比什麼都重要,將決定Crane未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Crane recorded free cash flow of 21% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.
最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤根本無法減少債務。因此,我們顯然需要研究該息稅前利潤是否會帶來相應的自由現金流。從最近三年來看,Crane記錄的自由現金流佔其息稅前利潤的21%,低於我們的預期。在償還債務方面,這並不好。
Our View
我們的觀點
The good news is that Crane's demonstrated ability to cover its interest expense with its EBIT delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow. Zooming out, Crane seems to use debt quite reasonably; and that gets the nod from us. While debt does bring risk, when used wisely it can also bring a higher return on equity. Over time, share prices tend to follow earnings per share, so if you're interested in Crane, you may well want to click here to check an interactive graph of its earnings per share history.
好消息是,Crane表現出的用息稅前利潤支付利息支出的能力使我們感到高興,就像毛茸茸的小狗對待幼兒一樣。但是,更悲觀的是,我們對其將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流感到有些擔憂。縮小規模,Crane 似乎相當合理地使用債務;這得到了我們的點頭。雖然債務確實會帶來風險,但如果明智地使用,它也可以帶來更高的股本回報率。隨着時間的推移,股價往往會跟隨每股收益,因此,如果您對Crane感興趣,不妨點擊此處查看其每股收益歷史的交互式圖表。
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
當然,如果你是那種喜歡在沒有債務負擔的情況下購買股票的投資者,那麼請立即查看我們的獨家淨現金增長股票清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。