share_log

Groupon's (NASDAQ:GRPN) Earnings Might Be Weaker Than You Think

Groupon's (NASDAQ:GRPN) Earnings Might Be Weaker Than You Think

groupon的(納斯達克:GRPN)盈利可能比您想象的要弱
Simply Wall St ·  11/19 05:51

The healthy profit announcement from Groupon, Inc. (NASDAQ:GRPN ) didn't seem to impress investors. We did some digging and found some worrying factors that they might be paying attention to.

Groupon, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:GRPN)公佈的健康盈利似乎並沒有給投資者留下深刻的印象。我們進行了一些挖掘,發現了一些他們可能會關注的令人擔憂的因素。

big
NasdaqGS:GRPN Earnings and Revenue History November 19th 2024
NASDAQGS: GRPN 收益和收入歷史記錄 2024 年 11 月 19 日

One essential aspect of assessing earnings quality is to look at how much a company is diluting shareholders. As it happens, Groupon issued 25% more new shares over the last year. As a result, its net income is now split between a greater number of shares. Per share metrics like EPS help us understand how much actual shareholders are benefitting from the company's profits, while the net income level gives us a better view of the company's absolute size. You can see a chart of Groupon's EPS by clicking here.

評估收益質量的一個重要方面是研究一家公司在多大程度上稀釋了股東。碰巧的是,Groupon發行的新股比去年增加了25%。結果,其淨收入現在分成了更多的股票。每股收益等每股指標可以幫助我們了解實際股東從公司的利潤中受益的程度,而淨收入水平則使我們能夠更好地了解公司的絕對規模。你可以點擊此處查看Groupon的每股收益圖表。

A Look At The Impact Of Groupon's Dilution On Its Earnings Per Share (EPS)

看看Groupon的稀釋對其每股收益(EPS)的影響

We don't have any data on the company's profits from three years ago. And even focusing only on the last twelve months, we don't have a meaningful growth rate because it made a loss a year ago, too. But mathematics aside, it is always good to see when a formerly unprofitable business come good (though we accept profit would have been higher if dilution had not been required). And so, you can see quite clearly that dilution is having a rather significant impact on shareholders.

我們沒有關於該公司三年前利潤的任何數據。而且,即使只關注過去的十二個月,我們也沒有一個有意義的增長率,因爲它在一年前也出現了虧損。但是,拋開數學不談,看看以前無利可圖的企業何時好起來總是件好事(儘管我們承認,如果不要求稀釋,利潤本來會更高)。因此,你可以清楚地看到,稀釋對股東產生了相當大的影響。

If Groupon's EPS can grow over time then that drastically improves the chances of the share price moving in the same direction. However, if its profit increases while its earnings per share stay flat (or even fall) then shareholders might not see much benefit. For that reason, you could say that EPS is more important that net income in the long run, assuming the goal is to assess whether a company's share price might grow.

如果Groupon的每股收益能夠隨着時間的推移而增長,那麼這將大大提高股價朝同一方向移動的機會。但是,如果其利潤增加而每股收益保持不變(甚至下降),那麼股東可能看不到太多好處。出於這個原因,你可以說從長遠來看,每股收益比淨收入更重要,前提是目標是評估公司的股價是否可能上漲。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓你想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以點擊此處查看根據他們的估計描繪未來盈利能力的交互式圖表。

How Do Unusual Items Influence Profit?

不尋常的物品如何影響利潤?

Alongside that dilution, it's also important to note that Groupon's profit was boosted by unusual items worth US$6.9m in the last twelve months. While we like to see profit increases, we tend to be a little more cautious when unusual items have made a big contribution. When we crunched the numbers on thousands of publicly listed companies, we found that a boost from unusual items in a given year is often not repeated the next year. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. Groupon had a rather significant contribution from unusual items relative to its profit to September 2024. All else being equal, this would likely have the effect of making the statutory profit a poor guide to underlying earnings power.

除了這種稀釋外,還需要注意的是,在過去的十二個月中,價值690萬美元的不尋常項目提振了Groupon的利潤。雖然我們希望看到利潤增加,但當不尋常的物品做出重大貢獻時,我們往往會更加謹慎一些。當我們計算數千家上市公司的數字時,我們發現,特定年份中不尋常的項目所帶來的提振通常不會在第二年重演。而且,畢竟,這正是會計術語的含義。相對於其截至2024年9月的利潤,Groupon的不尋常項目做出了相當可觀的貢獻。在其他條件相同的情況下,這可能會使法定利潤成爲衡量潛在盈利能力的不良指導。

Our Take On Groupon's Profit Performance

我們對Groupon利潤表現的看法

In its last report Groupon benefitted from unusual items which boosted its profit, which could make the profit seem better than it really is on a sustainable basis. On top of that, the dilution means that its earnings per share performance is worse than its profit performance. Considering all this we'd argue Groupon's profits probably give an overly generous impression of its sustainable level of profitability. If you want to do dive deeper into Groupon, you'd also look into what risks it is currently facing. For example, we've found that Groupon has 3 warning signs (1 is a bit concerning!) that deserve your attention before going any further with your analysis.

在上一份報告中,Groupon受益於不尋常的項目,這些項目提高了利潤,在可持續的基礎上,這可能會使利潤看起來好於實際利潤。最重要的是,稀釋意味着其每股收益表現不如其盈利表現。考慮到所有這些,我們認爲Groupon的利潤可能給人一種對其可持續盈利水平的過於慷慨的印象。如果你想更深入地研究Groupon,你還需要研究它目前面臨的風險。例如,我們發現 Groupon 有 3 個警告信號(1 個有點令人擔憂!)在進行進一步分析之前,這值得你注意。

Our examination of Groupon has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. And, on that basis, we are somewhat skeptical. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.

我們對Groupon的審查側重於某些可能使其收益看起來好於實際的因素。而且,在此基礎上,我們有些懷疑。但是,如果你能夠將注意力集中在細節上,總會有更多的事情需要發現。有些人認爲高股本回報率是優質業務的好兆頭。因此,你可能希望看到這份擁有高股本回報率的公司的免費集合,或者這份內部所有權高的股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論