share_log

Oshkosh (NYSE:OSK) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

Oshkosh (NYSE:OSK) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

oshkosh(紐交所:OSK)擁有相當健康的資產負債表
Simply Wall St ·  11/20 05:35

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, Oshkosh Corporation (NYSE:OSK) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

大衛·伊本說得好,他說:「波動性不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免資本的永久損失。」因此,當你評估公司的風險時,看來聰明的貨幣知道債務(通常涉及破產)是一個非常重要的因素。重要的是,奧什科什公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:OSK)確實有債務。但更重要的問題是:這筆債務會帶來多大的風險?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

債務可以幫助企業,直到企業難以償還債務,無論是新資本還是自由現金流。最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東們可能會一無所獲。儘管這種情況並不常見,但我們經常會看到負債公司永久稀釋股東,因爲貸款人迫使他們以不良价格籌集資金。當然,債務的好處在於它通常代表廉價資本,尤其是當它以高回報率進行再投資的能力取代公司的稀釋時。在考慮企業使用多少債務時,要做的第一件事是同時考慮其現金和債務。

What Is Oshkosh's Debt?

什麼是奧什科什的債務?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at September 2024 Oshkosh had debt of US$1.54b, up from US$1.10b in one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$160.9m, its net debt is less, at about US$1.38b.

您可以點擊下圖查看更多詳情,該圖片顯示,截至2024年9月,奧什科什的債務爲15.4億美元,高於一年的11.0億美元。但是,由於其現金儲備爲1.609億美元,其淨負債較少,約爲13.8億美元。

big
NYSE:OSK Debt to Equity History November 20th 2024
紐約證券交易所:OSK 債務與股本比率歷史記錄 2024 年 11 月 20 日

How Healthy Is Oshkosh's Balance Sheet?

奧什科什的資產負債表有多健康?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Oshkosh had liabilities of US$3.46b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$2.32b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$160.9m and US$2.47b worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$3.14b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

根據上次報告的資產負債表,奧什科什在12個月內到期的負債爲34.6億美元,12個月以後到期的負債爲23.2億美元。另一方面,它有1.609億美元的現金和價值24.7億美元的應收賬款將在一年內到期。因此,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出31.4億美元。

Oshkosh has a market capitalization of US$7.01b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.

奧什科什的市值爲70.1億美元,因此,如果需要,它很可能會籌集資金以改善其資產負債表。但是,我們絕對希望留意其債務帶來過大風險的跡象。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

爲了擴大公司相對於收益的負債規模,我們計算其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),將其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)除以利息支出(利息保障)。這種方法的優勢在於,我們既考慮了債務的絕對數量(包括淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤),也考慮了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(及其利息覆蓋率)。

Oshkosh has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 1.1. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 10.2 times the size. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. On top of that, Oshkosh grew its EBIT by 34% over the last twelve months, and that growth will make it easier to handle its debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Oshkosh can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

奧什科什的淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比率很低,僅爲1.1。而且其息稅前利潤很容易彌補其利息支出,是其規模的10.2倍。因此,你可以爭辯說,它受到債務的威脅並不比大象受到老鼠的威脅更大。最重要的是,奧什科什在過去十二個月中將其息稅前利潤增長了34%,這種增長將使其更容易處理債務。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但最終,該業務未來的盈利能力將決定奧什科什能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Considering the last three years, Oshkosh actually recorded a cash outflow, overall. Debt is usually more expensive, and almost always more risky in the hands of a company with negative free cash flow. Shareholders ought to hope for an improvement.

最後,儘管稅務人員可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受冷硬現金。因此,我們總是檢查該息稅前利潤中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。考慮到過去三年,奧什科什實際上總體上記錄了現金流出。債務通常更昂貴,而且對於自由現金流爲負的公司來說,風險幾乎總是更大。股東們應該希望有所改善。

Our View

我們的觀點

When it comes to the balance sheet, the standout positive for Oshkosh was the fact that it seems able to grow its EBIT confidently. But the other factors we noted above weren't so encouraging. In particular, conversion of EBIT to free cash flow gives us cold feet. Considering this range of data points, we think Oshkosh is in a good position to manage its debt levels. Having said that, the load is sufficiently heavy that we would recommend any shareholders keep a close eye on it. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Oshkosh that you should be aware of before investing here.

在資產負債表方面,奧什科什最大的積極因素是它似乎能夠自信地增長息稅前利潤。但是我們上面提到的其他因素並不那麼令人鼓舞。特別是,將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流使我們措手不及。考慮到這一系列數據點,我們認爲奧什科什完全有能力管理其債務水平。話雖如此,負擔足夠沉重,我們建議所有股東密切關注。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但是,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。例如,我們發現了奧什科什的一個警告信號,在這裏投資之前,你應該注意這個信號。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

歸根結底,通常最好專注於沒有淨負債的公司。您可以訪問我們的此類公司的特別名單(所有公司都有利潤增長的記錄)。它是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論