share_log

Does Dave & Buster's Entertainment (NASDAQ:PLAY) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

Does Dave & Buster's Entertainment (NASDAQ:PLAY) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

戴夫與巴斯特娛樂(納斯達克:PLAY)是否擁有健康的資產負債表?
Simply Wall St ·  11/20 08:50

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (NASDAQ:PLAY) does carry debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

傳奇基金經理李露(由查理·芒格支持)曾經說過:「最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受永久的資本損失。」當我們思考一家公司的風險有多大時,我們總是喜歡考慮其債務的用途,因爲債務過載可能導致破產。重要的是,戴夫和巴斯特娛樂公司(納斯達克股票代碼:PLAY)確實有債務。但是,股東是否應該擔心其債務的使用?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時危險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但是如果企業無法還清貸款人的債務,那麼債務就任其擺佈。如果情況變得非常糟糕,貸款人可以控制業務。儘管這種情況並不常見,但我們經常會看到負債公司永久稀釋股東,因爲貸款人迫使他們以不良价格籌集資金。當然,債務的好處在於它通常代表廉價資本,尤其是當它以高回報率進行再投資的能力取代公司的稀釋時。考慮公司的債務水平的第一步是同時考慮其現金和債務。

What Is Dave & Buster's Entertainment's Net Debt?

戴夫和巴斯特娛樂公司的淨負債是多少?

As you can see below, Dave & Buster's Entertainment had US$1.30b of debt, at August 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. And it doesn't have much cash, so its net debt is about the same.

如下所示,截至2024年8月,戴夫和巴斯特娛樂公司有13.0億美元的債務,與前一年大致相同。您可以單擊圖表以獲取更多詳細信息。而且它沒有太多現金,因此其淨負債大致相同。

big
NasdaqGS:PLAY Debt to Equity History November 20th 2024
NASDAQGS: 播放債轉股歷史記錄 2024 年 11 月 20 日

A Look At Dave & Buster's Entertainment's Liabilities

看看 Dave & Buster 娛樂公司的負債

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Dave & Buster's Entertainment had liabilities of US$408.2m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$3.14b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$13.1m in cash and US$20.8m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$3.52b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

我們可以從最新的資產負債表中看出,Dave & Buster's Entertainment的負債爲4.082億美元,一年後到期的負債爲31.4億美元。與此相抵消的是,它有1310萬美元的現金和2,080萬美元的應收賬款將在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出35.2億美元。

This deficit casts a shadow over the US$1.39b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. At the end of the day, Dave & Buster's Entertainment would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.

這筆赤字給這家13.9億美元的公司蒙上了陰影,就像一個聳立在凡人之上的巨人。因此,毫無疑問,我們將密切關注其資產負債表。歸根結底,如果債權人要求還款,戴夫和巴斯特娛樂公司可能需要進行大規模的資本重組。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了擴大公司相對於收益的負債規模,我們計算其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),將其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)除以利息支出(利息保障)。因此,我們將債務與收益的關係考慮在內,包括和不包括折舊和攤銷費用。

Even though Dave & Buster's Entertainment's debt is only 2.5, its interest cover is really very low at 2.2. This does have us wondering if the company pays high interest because it is considered risky. In any case, it's safe to say the company has meaningful debt. Unfortunately, Dave & Buster's Entertainment saw its EBIT slide 9.7% in the last twelve months. If earnings continue on that decline then managing that debt will be difficult like delivering hot soup on a unicycle. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Dave & Buster's Entertainment can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

儘管戴夫和巴斯特娛樂公司的債務僅爲2.5英鎊,但其利息覆蓋率確實很低,爲2.2。這確實讓我們想知道該公司是否因爲被認爲有風險而支付高額利息。無論如何,可以肯定地說該公司有大量債務。不幸的是,戴夫和巴斯特娛樂公司的息稅前利潤在過去十二個月中下降了9.7%。如果收益繼續下降,那麼管理這筆債務將像在獨輪車上送熱湯一樣困難。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到的關於債務的知識最多。但最終,該業務未來的盈利能力將決定戴夫和巴斯特娛樂公司能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, Dave & Buster's Entertainment's free cash flow amounted to 30% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最後,公司只能用冷硬現金償還債務,不能用會計利潤償還債務。因此,我們總是檢查該息稅前利潤中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。在過去的三年中,Dave & Buster's Entertainment的自由現金流佔其息稅前利潤的30%,低於我們的預期。在償還債務方面,這並不好。

Our View

我們的觀點

On the face of it, Dave & Buster's Entertainment's interest cover left us tentative about the stock, and its level of total liabilities was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. Having said that, its ability handle its debt, based on its EBITDA, isn't such a worry. Taking into account all the aforementioned factors, it looks like Dave & Buster's Entertainment has too much debt. That sort of riskiness is ok for some, but it certainly doesn't float our boat. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Dave & Buster's Entertainment you should be aware of, and 1 of them makes us a bit uncomfortable.

從表面上看,Dave & Buster's Entertainment的利息保障讓我們對該股持初步看法,其總負債水平並不比一年中最繁忙的夜晚那家空蕩蕩的餐廳更具吸引力。話雖如此,其根據息稅折舊攤銷前利潤處理債務的能力並不令人擔憂。考慮到上述所有因素,看來戴夫和巴斯特的娛樂公司有太多的債務。這種風險對某些人來說是可以的,但它肯定無法滿足我們的需求。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但是,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。一個很好的例子:我們發現了 Dave & Buster's Entertainment 的 2 個警告信號,你應該注意其中 1 個警告信號,其中一個讓我們有點不舒服。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

畢竟,如果你對一家資產負債表堅如磐石的快速成長型公司更感興趣,那麼請立即查看我們的淨現金增長股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論