With 54% Ownership in EVgo, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVGO), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
With 54% Ownership in EVgo, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVGO), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in EVgo implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 機構在EVgo的持股量很大,這意味着他們對公司股票價格有重要影響。
- 總共有25個投資者擁有公司的多數股份,佔有50%的所有權
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of EVgo, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVGO), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 54% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制着EVgo, Inc.(納斯達克:EVGO),了解公司的所有權結構非常重要。持有公司最多股份的群體大約佔54%,也就是機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,這個群體將獲得最大收益(或者在市場下跌時損失最多)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$1.8b in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 94%.
上週,機構投資者在公司市值達到18億美元后受益最大。上週的收益進一步提升了股東一年期的回報,目前爲94%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of EVgo, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解EVgo的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About EVgo?
機構投資者的擁有情況告訴我們關於EVgo什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that EVgo does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of EVgo, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到EVgo確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司相當一部分的股票。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好謹慎依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂的驗證。他們有時也會出錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出某隻股票,股票價格大幅下跌並不罕見。所以值得檢查一下EVgo過去的盈利軌跡(見下文)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in EVgo. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.5%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.4% and 5.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
機構投資者持有公司的超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強有力地影響董事會的決策。對沖基金在EVgo的股份不多。公司的最大股東是先鋒集團,擁有9.5%的股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有6.4%和5.5%的流通股。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of EVgo
EVgo的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can report that insiders do own shares in EVgo, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$20m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以報告,內部人士確實持有EVgo, Inc.的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到有一些潛在的重大對齊通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們的股份價值大約爲2000萬美元(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說這表明股東與董事會之間的利益一致。不過,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售股份。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 40% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over EVgo. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有40%股份的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對EVgo有一定的影響力。雖然這樣的股份規模可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司的政策產生集體影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 5.5%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
擁有5.5%的股份,股權投資公司有能力在以創造價值爲重點的公司策略制定中發揮作用。一些投資者可能會因爲這一點而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資有時能促進有助於市場認識到公司價值的策略。另一方面,那些股東可能在公司上市後退出投資。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with EVgo (including 1 which can't be ignored) .
雖然考慮擁有公司不同集團的情況是值得的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。爲了達到這一目的,您應該了解我們發現的EVgo的2個警示信號(包括一個不能被忽視的信號)。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。