share_log

In Spite of Recent Selling, Insiders at XD Inc. (HKG:2400) Are the Largest Shareholders; Own 45% Shares

In Spite of Recent Selling, Insiders at XD Inc. (HKG:2400) Are the Largest Shareholders; Own 45% Shares

雖然最近有大量售出,心動公司(HKG:2400)內部人士仍是最大股東;擁有45%的股份
Simply Wall St ·  11/20 18:00

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in XD's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 內部人士似乎對XD的增長有既得利益,從他們龐大的所有權可以看出
  • 共有5名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

If you want to know who really controls XD Inc. (HKG:2400), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 45% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着XD Inc.(HKG: 2400),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,個別內部人士擁有公司的大部分股份,所有權爲45%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

Even though insiders have sold shares recently, the group owns the most numbers of shares in the company and as a result benefitted the most after market cap rose HK$507m last week.

儘管內部人士最近出售了股票,但該集團擁有該公司最多的股份,因此在上週市值上漲5.07億港元之後,受益最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of XD.

在下圖中,我們放大了 XD 的不同所有權組。

big
SEHK:2400 Ownership Breakdown November 20th 2024
SEHK: 2400 所有權明細 2024 年 11 月 20 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About XD?

機構所有權告訴我們關於 XD 的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

XD already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of XD, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

XD 已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下XD過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
SEHK:2400 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 20th 2024
SEHK: 2400 2024年11月20日收益和收入增長

XD is not owned by hedge funds. With a 34% stake, CEO Yimeng Huang is the largest shareholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 2.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Yunjie Dai is also President, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

XD 不歸對沖基金所有。首席執行官黃一夢持有34%的股份,是最大股東。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的11%和2.0%。有趣的是,第二大股東戴雲傑再次擔任總裁,這表明公司最大股東擁有強大的內部所有權。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 50% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示了這樣一個事實,即公司約有50%的股份由前五名股東控制,這表明這些所有者對業務具有重大影響。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of XD

XD 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of XD Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful HK$4.9b stake in this HK$11b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

內部人士似乎擁有XD Inc.的很大一部分股份。有趣的是,內部人士在這項110億港元的業務中擁有49億港元的大量股份。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 43% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司43%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。儘管這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for XD that you should be aware of.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們已經確定了 XD 的 1 個警告標誌,你應該注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論