CK Asset Holdings Limited (HKG:1113) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 34% of the Company
CK Asset Holdings Limited (HKG:1113) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 34% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies CK Asset Holdings' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 5 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 顯著高的機構持股表明長實集團的股票價格對他們的交易行爲敏感
- 前5大股東持有50%的業務。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
If you want to know who really controls CK Asset Holdings Limited (HKG:1113), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 34% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制着長實集團有限公司(HKG:1113),那麼你需要查看其股東登記冊的構成。持有公司最多股份的集團,大約34%,確切地說,是機構。換句話說,這個集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of CK Asset Holdings.
在下面的圖表中,我們關注長實集團的不同持股群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CK Asset Holdings?
機構持股對長實集團告訴了我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that CK Asset Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see CK Asset Holdings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到長實集團確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的相當大一部分。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會進行糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在他們處於'擁擠交易'的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多方可能會競爭快速賣出股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到長實集團的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更復雜。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in CK Asset Holdings. The Li Ka-Shing Unity Discretionary Trust is currently the company's largest shareholder with 26% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 6.4% of the stock.
對沖基金在長實集團的股份不多。李嘉誠統一自由信託目前是公司最大的股東,持有26%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約10%和6.4%的股票。
On looking further, we found that 50% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
進一步觀察後,我們發現前5大股東佔有該公司50%的股份。換句話說,這些股東對公司的決策具有重要的發言權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of CK Asset Holdings
長實集團的內部股東持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in CK Asset Holdings Limited. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own HK$7.3b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
股東們可能會對內部人士持有長實集團的股票感興趣。 這是一家非常大的公司,董事會成員共同持有價值73億港元的股份(按當前價格計算)。 看到這種投資水平是很好的。 您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 31% stake in CK Asset Holdings. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有長實集團31%的股份。 儘管這個群體不一定能夠掌控一切,但他們確實可以對公司的運營產生真正的影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 29%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到,私營企業擁有已發行股份的29%。這可能值得進一步研究。如果相關方,如內部人,在其中一傢俬營企業有利益,那麼這應該在年報中披露。私營企業可能也對公司有戰略性的利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for CK Asset Holdings that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常重要的,但還有其他更重要的因素。 例如,我們發現了長實集團值得注意的兩個警告信號,投資之前你應該了解這些。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。