Chongqing Zhifei Biological Products Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300122) CEO Rensheng Jiang, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 7.3% Reduction in Holdings Value
Chongqing Zhifei Biological Products Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300122) CEO Rensheng Jiang, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 7.3% Reduction in Holdings Value
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Chongqing Zhifei Biological Products' growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- The top 2 shareholders own 54% of the company
- Institutions own 13% of Chongqing Zhifei Biological Products
- 業內人士似乎對重慶智飛生物製品的增長有既得利益,從他們龐大的所有權來看
- 前2名股東擁有公司54%的股份
- 機構持有重慶智飛生物製品 13% 的股份
A look at the shareholders of Chongqing Zhifei Biological Products Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300122) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 59% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看重慶智飛生物製品有限公司(SZSE: 300122)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。個人內部人士持有公司59%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
As market cap fell to CN¥72b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
隨着上週市值跌至720元人民幣,內部人士面臨的損失將超過該公司任何其他股東群體。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Chongqing Zhifei Biological Products, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究重慶智飛生物製品的每種所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chongqing Zhifei Biological Products?
關於重慶智飛生物製品,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。
We can see that Chongqing Zhifei Biological Products does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Chongqing Zhifei Biological Products' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到,重慶智飛生物製品確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看重慶智飛生物製品的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Chongqing Zhifei Biological Products. With a 48% stake, CEO Rensheng Jiang is the largest shareholder. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.4% and 3.8% of the stock. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Lingfeng Jiang is also Senior Key Executive, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對重慶智飛生物製品進行有意義的投資。首席執行官姜仁生持有48%的股份,是最大的股東。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約5.4%和3.8%的股份。有趣的是,第二大股東Lingfeng Jiang也是高級主要高管,這再次表明公司最大股東擁有強大的內部所有權。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現前兩位股東共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着他們擁有影響公司決策的巨大權力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Chongqing Zhifei Biological Products
重慶智飛生物製品的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Chongqing Zhifei Biological Products Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. That means insiders have a very meaningful CN¥43b stake in this CN¥72b business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if they have been selling down their stake.
我們的信息表明,內部人士擁有重慶智飛生物製品有限公司一半以上的股份。這使他們能夠有效控制公司。這意味着內部人士在這項720元人民幣的業務中擁有非常有價值的430元人民幣的股份。大多數人會認爲這是積極的,顯示出與股東的強烈一致性。您可以點擊此處查看他們是否一直在出售其股份。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司27%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Chongqing Zhifei Biological Products that you should be aware of.
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了重慶智飛生物製品的3個警告信號,你應該注意這些信號。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。