Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as Guangzhou Jinyi Media Corporation (SZSE:002905) Touches CN¥3.0b Market Cap
Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as Guangzhou Jinyi Media Corporation (SZSE:002905) Touches CN¥3.0b Market Cap
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significant insider control over Guangzhou Jinyi Media implies vested interests in company growth
- Xiao Wen Li owns 65% of the company
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 對廣州錦藝傳媒的重大內部控制意味着公司增長的既得利益
- 李小文擁有該公司 65% 的股份
- 公司過去的表現以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有一個很好的了解
If you want to know who really controls Guangzhou Jinyi Media Corporation (SZSE:002905), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 65% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制了廣州錦藝傳媒股份有限公司(深圳證券交易所:002905),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有65%所有權的個人內部人士。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥380m last week.
顯然,上週該公司的市值上漲了38000萬元人民幣之後,內部人士受益最大。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Guangzhou Jinyi Media.
在下圖中,我們放大了廣州金易傳媒的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Guangzhou Jinyi Media?
關於廣州金易傳媒,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Guangzhou Jinyi Media. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Guangzhou Jinyi Media's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如您所見,機構投資者持有廣州金易傳媒的相當數量的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到廣州金易傳媒的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Guangzhou Jinyi Media. Our data shows that Xiao Wen Li is the largest shareholder with 65% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.5% and 0.7% of the stock.
對沖基金在廣州金易傳媒的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,李小文是最大股東,已發行股份的65%。由於所有權持有如此巨額的股份,我們推斷他們對公司的未來擁有重大控制權。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約9.5%和0.7%的股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。
Insider Ownership Of Guangzhou Jinyi Media
廣州金易傳媒的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Guangzhou Jinyi Media Corporation. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. That means they own CN¥2.0b worth of shares in the CN¥3.0b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有廣州金藝傳媒集團的大部分股份。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決策。這意味着他們擁有這家30元人民幣公司價值20元人民幣的股份。這很有意義。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望(免費)了解他們是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Guangzhou Jinyi Media. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
擁有20%所有權的廣大公衆,主要是個人投資者,對廣州金易傳媒有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股權所有權
With a stake of 9.5%, private equity firms could influence the Guangzhou Jinyi Media board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
私募股權公司持有9.5%的股份,可能會影響廣州金易傳媒董事會。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
許多人發現,深入了解一家公司過去的表現很有用。您可以訪問這張過去的收益、收入和現金流的詳細圖表。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,來看看這份免費的有趣公司名單吧。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。