Private Companies Account for 45% of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600754) Ownership, While Individual Investors Account for 43%
Private Companies Account for 45% of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600754) Ownership, While Individual Investors Account for 43%
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- 12% of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels is held by Institutions
- 私人公司對錦江b股的顯著控制意味着公衆對管理和治理相關決策有更大的影響力
- 共有6名投資者擁有該公司的多數股權,擁有50%的所有權。
- 12%的錦江b股由機構持有
If you want to know who really controls Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600754), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 45% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道誰真正控制了錦江b股(上交所代碼:600754),你需要查看其股票登記的構成。私人公司持有45%的股份,是公司中擁有最大股份的群體。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團的利益將最大(或者在下跌時損失也最大)。
Meanwhile, individual investors make up 43% of the company's shareholders.
與此同時,個人投資者佔該公司股東的43%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels.
在下圖中,我們放大了錦江b股的不同持有群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels?
機構持股對錦江b股有什麼啓示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
錦江b股已經有機構在股東名冊上了。實際上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。 這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師們對這隻股票進行了評估,並且他們喜歡它。 但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們可能處於「擁擠的交易」之中的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個參與者可能會競爭快速賣出股票。對於缺乏增長曆史的公司來說,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到錦江b股的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,總有更多的故事。
Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Jinjiang International Holdings Co.,Ltd is the largest shareholder with 45% of shares outstanding. With 1.5% and 1.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, Yinhua Fund Management Co., Ltd. and HuaAn Fund Management Company Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.
錦江b股並不被對沖基金持有。我們的數據顯示,錦江國際控股有限公司是最大股東,持有45%的流通股。 其次是盈華基金管理有限公司和華安基金管理有限公司,分別持有1.5%和1.1%的流通股。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以知道風向如何。就我們所知,目前並沒有該公司的分析師覆蓋。因此,可能被忽略了。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels
上海錦江國際酒店的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our information suggests that Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels Co., Ltd. insiders own under 1% of the company. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around CN¥2.6m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,錦江b股內部人士持有公司不到1%的股份。 然而,內部人士可能通過更復雜的結構間接持有股份。 這是一個相當大的公司,因此董事會成員可能在公司中擁有重要的股份,而不需要持有較大比例的股份。在這種情況下,他們持有價值約260萬人民幣的股份(按當前價格計算)。 可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣重要。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 43% stake in Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有錦江b股43%的股份。 雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 45%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據表明,私營企業持有該公司的45%股份。 僅憑這一事實很難得出結論,因此值得考慮擁有這些私營企業的人。 有時,內部人員或其他相關方通過單獨的私營企業在公開公司中擁有股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常重要的,但還有其他因素更加重要。以風險爲例——錦江b股有1個我們認爲你應該注意的警告信號。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。