Insiders Were the Key Beneficiaries as Ribo Fashion Group Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603196) Market Cap Rises to CN¥3.8b
Insiders Were the Key Beneficiaries as Ribo Fashion Group Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603196) Market Cap Rises to CN¥3.8b
Key Insights
主要見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Ribo Fashion Group's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- 53% of the business is held by the top 5 shareholders
- Institutional ownership in Ribo Fashion Group is 13%
- 內部人員似乎對日播時尚的增長有着極大的興趣,這可以從他們持有的大量股份中看出
- 五大股東佔了該公司53%的股權。
- 日播時尚的機構所有權爲13%
If you want to know who really controls Ribo Fashion Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603196), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 46% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道誰真正控制日播時尚集團股份有限公司(SHSE:603196),那麼你需要看看其股東名冊的構成。持有最大股份的是個人內部人員,佔46%的所有權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或在下行時虧損最多)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥3.8b market cap following a 14% gain in the stock.
結果,上週公司股價上漲14%,市值達到38億人民幣,內部人士得分最高。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Ribo Fashion Group.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注日播時尚的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ribo Fashion Group?
機構持股告訴我們有關日播時尚的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Ribo Fashion Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Ribo Fashion Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
日播時尚已經有機構在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當大的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤,就像其他人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面的日播時尚的收入歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Ribo Fashion Group. Feng Liang is currently the company's largest shareholder with 25% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.8% and 7.3% of the stock. In addition, we found that Shengyu Wang, the CEO has 6.2% of the shares allocated to their name.
對於日播時尚,對沖基金持有的股份不多。目前,股東中最大的是馮亮,持有25%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約8.8%和7.3%的股份。此外,我們發現CEO孫玉王名下持有公司6.2%的股份。
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 53% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
我們的研究還揭示了這樣一個事實,即約53%的公司由前5大股東控制,這表明這些所有者在業務上具有重要的影響力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但還是研究分析師的建議,以深入了解股票預期表現,是一個好習慣。就我們所知,該公司沒有分析師覆蓋,因此可能沒有引起注意。
Insider Ownership Of Ribo Fashion Group
日播時尚股份的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Ribo Fashion Group Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥1.8b stake in this CN¥3.8b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起來內部人士擁有日播時尚股份有限公司的相當比例。內部人士在這家市值3800000000人民幣的公司中持有18億人民幣的股份。看到內部人士對業務投入如此之多真是太好了。也許值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 29% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Ribo Fashion Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
作爲擁有29%所有權的普通大衆,主要包括個人投資者,可以在日播時尚集團公司中施加一定程度的影響。儘管這部分所有權相當可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 11%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有公司股份的11%。值得深入了解。如果關聯方,如內部人士,對其中一傢俬人公司感興趣,那應在年度報告中披露。私人公司可能也對該公司具有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Ribo Fashion Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Ribo Fashion Group you should be aware of.
思考擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解日播時尚,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如:我們已經發現了日播時尚的1個警示信號,您應該注意。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。