share_log

Is Frontdoor (NASDAQ:FTDR) Using Too Much Debt?

Is Frontdoor (NASDAQ:FTDR) Using Too Much Debt?

Frontdoor(納斯達克:FTDR)是否使用了過多的債務?
Simply Wall St ·  11/22 05:21

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. As with many other companies Frontdoor, Inc. (NASDAQ:FTDR) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

禾倫·巴菲特曾說過一句名言:「波動性遠非風險的代名詞。」因此,當你評估公司的風險時,看來聰明的貨幣知道債務(通常涉及破產)是一個非常重要的因素。與許多其他公司一樣,Frontdoor, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:FTDR)也使用債務。但更重要的問題是:債務創造了多大的風險?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時危險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但是如果企業無法償還貸款,那麼債務就任其擺佈。如果情況變得非常糟糕,貸款人可以控制業務。儘管這種情況並不常見,但我們經常會看到負債公司永久稀釋股東,因爲貸款人迫使他們以不良价格籌集資金。當然,債務可以成爲企業的重要工具,尤其是資本密集型企業。當我們檢查債務水平時,我們首先要同時考慮現金和債務水平。

What Is Frontdoor's Debt?

什麼是前門債務?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Frontdoor had US$582.0m in debt in September 2024; about the same as the year before. However, it does have US$378.0m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$204.0m.

您可以點擊下圖以獲取更多詳細信息,該圖表顯示,2024年9月,Frontdoor的債務爲5.82億美元;與前一年大致相同。但是,它確實有3.78億美元的現金抵消了這一點,淨負債約爲2.04億美元。

big
NasdaqGS:FTDR Debt to Equity History November 22nd 2024
NASDAQGS: FTDR 債務與股本比率歷史記錄 2024 年 11 月 22 日

A Look At Frontdoor's Liabilities

看看 Frontdoor 的負債

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Frontdoor had liabilities of US$341.0m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$615.0m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$378.0m and US$81.0m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$497.0m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

我們可以從最新的資產負債表中看出,Frontdoor的負債爲3.41億美元,一年後到期的負債爲6.15億美元。另一方面,它有3.78億美元的現金和價值8,10萬美元的應收賬款將在一年內到期。因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總額高出4.970億美元。

Given Frontdoor has a market capitalization of US$4.27b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time.

鑑於Frontdoor的市值爲42.7億美元,很難相信這些負債會構成很大的威脅。但是,我們確實認爲值得關注其資產負債表的實力,因爲它可能會隨着時間的推移而發生變化。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

爲了擴大公司相對於收益的負債規模,我們計算其淨負債除以其扣除利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA)和其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)除以其利息支出(利息保障)。這樣,我們既要考慮債務的絕對數量,也要考慮爲其支付的利率。

Frontdoor has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.52. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 17.9 times over. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. On top of that, Frontdoor grew its EBIT by 38% over the last twelve months, and that growth will make it easier to handle its debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Frontdoor can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Frontdoor的淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比率很低,僅爲0.52。其息稅前利潤覆蓋了高達17.9倍的利息支出。因此,我們對它超保守的債務使用相當放鬆。最重要的是,Frontdoor在過去十二個月中將其息稅前利潤增長了38%,這種增長將使其更容易處理債務。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但最終,該業務未來的盈利能力將決定Frontdoor能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Frontdoor recorded free cash flow worth 64% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最後,公司只能用冷硬現金償還債務,不能用會計利潤償還債務。因此,我們顯然需要研究該息稅前利潤是否會帶來相應的自由現金流。在最近三年中,鑑於自由現金流不包括利息和稅收,Frontdoor記錄了相當於其息稅前利潤64%的自由現金流,這幾乎是正常的。這種冷硬現金意味着它可以在需要時減少債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

Happily, Frontdoor's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And that's just the beginning of the good news since its EBIT growth rate is also very heartening. Overall, we don't think Frontdoor is taking any bad risks, as its debt load seems modest. So we're not worried about the use of a little leverage on the balance sheet. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Frontdoor .

令人高興的是,Frontdoor令人印象深刻的利息保障意味着它在債務上佔了上風。這僅僅是好消息的開始,因爲其息稅前利潤增長率也非常令人鼓舞。總體而言,我們認爲Frontdoor沒有冒任何不良風險,因爲其債務負擔似乎不大。因此,我們並不擔心在資產負債表上使用一點槓桿作用。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但歸根結底,每家公司都可以控制資產負債表之外存在的風險。爲此,你應該注意我們在Frontdoor中發現的1個警告標誌。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

歸根結底,通常最好專注於沒有淨負債的公司。您可以訪問我們的此類公司的特別名單(所有公司都有利潤增長的記錄)。它是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論