share_log

Institutions Along With Private Companies Who Hold Considerable Shares InGolden Ocean Group Limited (NASDAQ:GOGL) Come Under Pressure; Lose 6.5% of Holdings Value

Institutions Along With Private Companies Who Hold Considerable Shares InGolden Ocean Group Limited (NASDAQ:GOGL) Come Under Pressure; Lose 6.5% of Holdings Value

擁有大量Golden Ocean Group Limited(納斯達克:GOGL)股份的機構和私營公司受到壓力影響,持有價值損失6.5%。
Simply Wall St ·  11/22 05:47

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Golden Ocean Group's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Institutions own 34% of Golden Ocean Group
  • 金海集團擁有大量私營公司所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 共有4位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 機構擁有金海集團34%的股份

Every investor in Golden Ocean Group Limited (NASDAQ:GOGL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 39% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

金海集團有限公司(納斯達克股票代碼:GOGL)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有39%所有權的私營公司。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

While the holdings of private companies took a hit after last week's 6.5% price drop, institutions with their 34% holdings also suffered.

儘管在上週股價下跌6.5%之後,私營公司的持股量受到打擊,但持有34%的機構也遭受了損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Golden Ocean Group, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究金海集團的每種所有者。

big
NasdaqGS:GOGL Ownership Breakdown November 22nd 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:GOGL 所有權明細 2024 年 11 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Golden Ocean Group?

關於金海集團,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Golden Ocean Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Golden Ocean Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,金海集團確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看金海集團過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:GOGL Earnings and Revenue Growth November 22nd 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:GOGL 收益和收入增長 2024 年 11 月 22 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Golden Ocean Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Greenwich Holdings Ltd. with 39% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.4% and 3.7% of the stock.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對金海集團進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是格林威治控股有限公司,已發行股份的39%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約5.4%和3.7%的股份。

On looking further, we found that 51% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步觀察,我們發現前四名股東持有51%的股份。換句話說,這些股東在公司的決策中擁有有意義的發言權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Golden Ocean Group

金海集團的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that Golden Ocean Group Limited insiders own under 1% of the company. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$200k worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,金海集團有限公司內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。但是,內部人士有可能通過更復雜的結構獲得間接利益。這是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員有可能在不擁有太多比例權益的情況下擁有該公司的有意義的權益。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約20萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。您可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 26% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Golden Ocean Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有26%的所有權的公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對金海集團有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 39%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的39%。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Golden Ocean Group that you should be aware of before investing here.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現了金海集團的兩個警告信號,在投資之前,您應該注意這些信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論