PPL's (NYSE:PPL) Returns On Capital Tell Us There Is Reason To Feel Uneasy
PPL's (NYSE:PPL) Returns On Capital Tell Us There Is Reason To Feel Uneasy
What underlying fundamental trends can indicate that a company might be in decline? When we see a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) in conjunction with a declining base of capital employed, that's often how a mature business shows signs of aging. This reveals that the company isn't compounding shareholder wealth because returns are falling and its net asset base is shrinking. So after glancing at the trends within PPL (NYSE:PPL), we weren't too hopeful.
什麼潛在的基本趨勢可能表明一家公司可能正在衰退?當我們看到資本利用率(ROCE)下降,同時資本利用基數也在下降,這通常是一個成熟企業顯示老化跡象的方式。這表明公司並未使股東財富增長,因爲回報在下降,淨資產基數也在縮小。因此,在研究PPL(紐約證券交易所:PPL)的趨勢後,我們並不太樂觀。
Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)
上面您可以看到蒙托克可再生能源現行ROCE與之前資本回報的比較,但過去只能知道這麼多。如果您感興趣,可以查看我們免費的蒙托克可再生能源分析師報告,了解分析師的預測。
Just to clarify if you're unsure, ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. To calculate this metric for PPL, this is the formula:
只是爲了澄清,如果您不確定,ROCE是評估公司在其業務中投資的資本上賺取多少稅前收入(以百分比表示)的度量標準。要爲PPL計算這個指標,這是公式:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資本利用率 = 利息和稅前利潤(EBIT) ÷ (總資產 - 流動負債)
0.05 = US$1.9b ÷ (US$40b - US$2.3b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.05 = 19億美元 ÷ (400億美元 - 23億美元)(基於2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
So, PPL has an ROCE of 5.0%. Even though it's in line with the industry average of 4.8%, it's still a low return by itself.
因此,PPL的ROCE爲5.0%。儘管它與行業平均水平4.8%相符,但單獨來看仍然是較低的回報。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241122/0-53911853ec79950e79e72edc52726da2-0-6dd7cd9842763480992d02a8d1a0657f.png/big)
Above you can see how the current ROCE for PPL compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering PPL for free.
上面你可以看到PPL目前的ROCE與之前的資本回報率相比,但過去只能告訴你這麼多。如果你願意,你可以免費查看分析師對PPL的預測。
What Can We Tell From PPL's ROCE Trend?
從PPL的ROCE趨勢我們能得出什麼結論呢?
In terms of PPL's historical ROCE movements, the trend doesn't inspire confidence. About five years ago, returns on capital were 7.6%, however they're now substantially lower than that as we saw above. On top of that, it's worth noting that the amount of capital employed within the business has remained relatively steady. Since returns are falling and the business has the same amount of assets employed, this can suggest it's a mature business that hasn't had much growth in the last five years. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on PPL becoming one if things continue as they have.
就PPL歷史ROCE走勢而言,這一趨勢並不令人信心滿滿。大約五年前,資本回報率爲7.6%,然而現在遠低於此,正如我們前面所見。除此之外,值得注意的是,企業所使用的資本量保持相對穩定。由於回報率正在下降,而業務所使用的資產仍然相同,這可能表明這是一個在過去五年內沒有太多增長的成熟業務。因此,由於這些趨勢通常不利於創造成倍增長,如果事情繼續下去,我們就不會對PPL成爲成倍增長股抱有太大期望。
In Conclusion...
最後,同等資本下回報率較低的趨勢通常不是我們關注創業板股票的最佳信號。由於這些發展進行良好,因此投資者不太可能表現友好。自五年前以來,該股下跌了32%。除非這些指標朝着更積極的軌跡轉變,否則我們將繼續尋找其他股票。
In summary, it's unfortunate that PPL is generating lower returns from the same amount of capital. Investors must expect better things on the horizon though because the stock has risen 27% in the last five years. Regardless, we don't like the trends as they are and if they persist, we think you might find better investments elsewhere.
總之,不幸的是,PPL從同等資本中產生了更低的回報。投資者必須期待未來會有更好的情況,因爲股價在過去五年中上漲了27%。儘管如此,我們不喜歡當前的趨勢,如果它們繼續存在,我們認爲你可能會在別處找到更好的投資機會。
One more thing to note, we've identified 2 warning signs with PPL and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
還有一件事要注意,我們已經發現了PPL存在2個警告信號,了解它們應該成爲你的投資過程的一部分。
If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.
如果您想尋找財務狀況良好、回報卓越的實力強企業,可以免費查看以下公司列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。