share_log

Cerence Inc. (NASDAQ:CRNC) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 66% Loss Over the Past Year

Cerence Inc. (NASDAQ:CRNC) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 66% Loss Over the Past Year

Cerence Inc. (納斯達克:CRNC) 機構所有者可能會對近年來66%的損失後的最近收益感到滿意
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/22 20:34

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Cerence's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 考慮到機構在股票中持有的巨大股份,Cerence的股價可能受到他們交易決策的影響。
  • 共有13位投資者在公司中持有51%的多數股份。
  • 高管近期的賣出行爲

A look at the shareholders of Cerence Inc. (NASDAQ:CRNC) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 84% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

觀察Cerence公司(納斯達克:CRNC)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有84%的股份。換句話說,該群體從其對公司的投資中可能獲得最多的收益(或遭受最多的損失)。

After a year of 66% losses, last week's 91% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a possible sign that returns might start trending higher.

經過一年的66%損失,上週的91%漲幅將受到機構投資者的歡迎,可能預示着收益趨勢開始向上。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Cerence.

在下面的圖表中,我們將關注Cerence的不同所有權群體。

big
NasdaqGS:CRNC Ownership Breakdown November 22nd 2024
納斯達克GS:CRNC 所有權分佈 2024年11月22日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cerence?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Cerence的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。

Cerence already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Cerence, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Cerence已經在股份登記冊上有機構參與。實際上,他們在公司的股份相當可觀。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經關注了這隻 股票,並且他們喜歡這隻股票。但和其他人一樣,他們可能也是錯的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試賣出同一只股票,出現大幅股價下跌並不罕見。因此,值得查看Cerence過去的營業收入趨勢(見下文)。當然,記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:CRNC Earnings and Revenue Growth November 22nd 2024
納斯達克GS:CRNC 2024年11月22日的收益和營業收入增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Cerence is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that American Capital Management, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 9.4% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.9% and 7.4% of the stock.

機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可能會強有力地影響董事會的決策。Cerence並不被對沖基金擁有。我們的數據顯示,美國資本管理公司是最大的股東,持有9.4%的流通股。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東各持有約7.9%和7.4%的股票。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步調查,我們發現前13大股東在公司中的合計持股比例爲51%,這表明沒有單一股東對公司擁有重大控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構持股可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一種良好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師覆蓋此股票,因此您可以很容易地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Cerence

Cerence的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算作內部人。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會的成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Cerence Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$9.1m worth of stock in the US$244m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

股東可能會感興趣地了解到內部人士在Cerence Inc.擁有股份。內部人士以自己的名義擁有價值910萬美元的股票,而該公司的市值爲24400萬美元。這至少顯示了一定的利益一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否有買入或賣出的行爲。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Cerence. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有12%股份的公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對Cerence有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體不一定能夠決定公司的運營,但他們確實可以對公司的運行產生真實的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Cerence better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Cerence (1 is significant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

始終值得思考擁有公司股份的不同群體。但要更好地了解Cerence,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如,我們發現了Cerence的3個警告信號(1個是重要的!)在這裏投資之前你應該了解。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論