share_log

Following a 24% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Matthews International Corporation (NASDAQ:MATW) Institutional Owners

Following a 24% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Matthews International Corporation (NASDAQ:MATW) Institutional Owners

在過去一年中下跌了24%之後,最近的漲幅可能會讓馬修國際公司(納斯達克:MATW)的機構股東感到滿意。
Simply Wall St ·  11/22 21:00

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Matthews International implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 53% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構在馬修斯國際的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 53% 的業務由前 8 名股東持有
  • 所有權研究與過去的表現數據相結合,可以幫助人們更好地了解股票的機會

Every investor in Matthews International Corporation (NASDAQ:MATW) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

馬修斯國際公司(納斯達克股票代碼:MATW)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。機構擁有83%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

After a year of 24% losses, last week's 7.5% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a possible sign that returns might start trending higher.

在經歷了24%的虧損之後,上週7.5%的漲幅將受到機構投資者的歡迎,這可能表明回報率可能開始呈上升趨勢。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Matthews International.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於馬修斯國際的什麼。

big
NasdaqGS:MATW Ownership Breakdown November 22nd 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:MATW 所有權明細 2024 年 11 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Matthews International?

關於馬修斯國際,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Matthews International already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Matthews International's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

馬修斯國際已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看馬修斯國際的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:MATW Earnings and Revenue Growth November 22nd 2024
納斯達克GS:2024年11月22日MATW收益和收入增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Matthews International. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 15%. With 11% and 5.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Joseph Bartolacci is the owner of 1.5% of the company's shares.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對馬修斯國際進行有意義的投資。該公司的最大股東是貝萊德公司,所有權爲15%。Vanguard Group, Inc.和哥倫比亞管理投資顧問有限責任公司分別擁有11%和5.5%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。此外,首席執行官約瑟夫·巴托拉奇是該公司1.5%股份的所有者。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們又進行了一些挖掘,發現8位最大股東約佔登記冊的53%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Matthews International

馬修斯國際的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Matthews International Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$737m, and insiders have US$31m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有馬修斯國際公司的股份。它的市值僅爲7.37億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值3100萬美元的股票。這至少顯示出一定的對齊性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Matthews International. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有馬修斯國際13%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Matthews International (of which 2 are a bit concerning!) you should know about.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。比如風險。每家公司都有它們,我們已經發現了馬修斯國際的3個警告標誌(其中2個有點令人擔憂!)你應該知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論