U-Haul Holding (NYSE:UHAL) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet
U-Haul Holding (NYSE:UHAL) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies U-Haul Holding Company (NYSE:UHAL) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
霍華德·馬克斯說得好,他說的不是擔心股價的波動,而是 「永久損失的可能性是我擔心的風險... 也是我認識的每位實際投資者所擔心的風險。」當我們思考一家公司的風險有多大時,我們總是喜歡考慮其債務的用途,因爲債務過載可能導致破產。與許多其他公司一樣,UHAL Holding Company(紐約證券交易所代碼:UHAL)也使用債務。但真正的問題是這筆債務是否使公司面臨風險。
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來什麼風險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
當企業無法通過自由現金流或以有吸引力的價格籌集資金來輕鬆履行這些義務時,債務和其他負債就會變得有風險。在最壞的情況下,如果一家公司無法償還債權人,它可能會破產。但是,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東才能控制債務。話雖如此,最常見的情況是公司合理地管理其債務,而且對自己有利。考慮公司的債務水平的第一步是同時考慮其現金和債務。
What Is U-Haul Holding's Net Debt?
U-Haul Holding的淨負債是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 U-Haul Holding had US$6.68b of debt, an increase on US$6.15b, over one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$1.44b, its net debt is less, at about US$5.25b.
你可以點擊下圖查看歷史數字,但它顯示,截至2024年9月,U-Haul Holding在一年內有66.8億美元的債務,比61.5億美元有所增加。但是,由於其現金儲備爲14.4億美元,其淨負債較少,約爲52.5億美元。
How Strong Is U-Haul Holding's Balance Sheet?
U-Haul Holding的資產負債表有多強?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that U-Haul Holding had liabilities of US$964.1m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$11.6b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$1.44b as well as receivables valued at US$271.8m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$10.9b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
我們可以從最新的資產負債表中看出,U-Haul Holding的負債爲9.641億美元,一年後到期的負債爲116億美元。除這些債務外,它有14.4億美元的現金以及價值2.718億美元的應收賬款在12個月內到期。因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和高出109億美元。
This deficit is considerable relative to its very significant market capitalization of US$12.0b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on U-Haul Holding's use of debt. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.
相對於其非常可觀的120億美元市值,這一赤字相當可觀,因此這確實表明股東應密切關注U-Haul Holding使用債務的情況。這表明,如果公司需要迅速支撐資產負債表,股東將被嚴重稀釋。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我們通過以下方法來衡量公司的債務負擔與其盈利能力:將其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),並計算其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)支付利息支出(利息保障)的難易程度。這種方法的優勢在於,我們既考慮了債務的絕對數量(包括淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤),也考慮了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(及其利息覆蓋率)。
U-Haul Holding's debt is 3.1 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 6.7 times over. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. Importantly, U-Haul Holding's EBIT fell a jaw-dropping 38% in the last twelve months. If that earnings trend continues then paying off its debt will be about as easy as herding cats on to a roller coaster. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine U-Haul Holding's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
U-Haul Holding的債務是其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的3.1倍,其息稅前利潤支付利息支出的6.7倍。綜上所述,這意味着,儘管我們不希望債務水平上升,但我們認爲它可以承受目前的槓桿率。重要的是,U-Haul Holding的息稅前利潤在過去十二個月中下降了驚人的38%。如果這種盈利趨勢繼續下去,那麼償還債務就像放貓坐過山車一樣容易。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但是,未來的收益將決定U-Haul Holding未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, U-Haul Holding saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While investors are no doubt expecting a reversal of that situation in due course, it clearly does mean its use of debt is more risky.
最後,公司只能用冷硬現金償還債務,不能用會計利潤償還債務。因此,我們顯然需要研究該息稅前利潤是否會帶來相應的自由現金流。在過去的三年中,U-Haul Holding的自由現金流總額爲負數。儘管投資者無疑預計這種情況將在適當的時候逆轉,但這顯然意味着其使用債務的風險更大。
Our View
我們的觀點
On the face of it, U-Haul Holding's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow left us tentative about the stock, and its EBIT growth rate was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But at least it's pretty decent at covering its interest expense with its EBIT; that's encouraging. Overall, it seems to us that U-Haul Holding's balance sheet is really quite a risk to the business. So we're almost as wary of this stock as a hungry kitten is about falling into its owner's fish pond: once bitten, twice shy, as they say. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for U-Haul Holding you should know about.
從表面上看,U-Haul Holding將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流使我們對該股持初步看法,其息稅前利潤增長率並不比一年中最繁忙的夜晚那家空蕩蕩的餐廳更具吸引力。但至少它在用息稅前利潤支付利息支出方面相當不錯;這令人鼓舞。總體而言,在我們看來,U-Haul Holding的資產負債表確實對業務構成了相當大的風險。因此,我們對這隻魚的警惕幾乎就像一隻飢餓的小貓要掉進主人的魚池一樣警惕:正如他們所說,一旦被咬傷,兩次害羞。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但是,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。這些風險可能很難發現。每家公司都有它們,我們發現了兩個你應該知道的U-Haul Holding警告標誌。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
歸根結底,通常最好專注於沒有淨負債的公司。您可以訪問我們的此類公司的特別名單(所有公司都有利潤增長的記錄)。它是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。