share_log

In the Wake of Opendoor Technologies Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OPEN) Latest US$50m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions

In the Wake of Opendoor Technologies Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OPEN) Latest US$50m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions

在Opendoor Technologies Inc.(納斯達克:OPEN)最新市值下降5000萬美元的情況下,機構投資者可能被迫採取嚴厲的措施。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/22 05:06

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Opendoor Technologies' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鑑於機構在股票中持有的巨大股份,opendoor technologies的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
  • 前15名股東持有該公司50%的業務。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Opendoor Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:OPEN), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 55% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了opendoor technologies公司(納斯達克:OPEN),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,機構在公司中佔據了大部分股份,擁有55%的股份。換句話說,這一群體從他們對公司的投資中最有可能獲得最大收益(或承受最大損失)。

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$50m. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 31% for shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Opendoor Technologies, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

因此,上週機構投資者遭受了最高的損失,因爲市值下降了5000萬美元。這類投資者可能尤其關心目前的虧損,這使得股東的年虧損達到了31%。通常被稱爲"市場推動者"的機構在影響股票價格動態方面具有重要的力量。因此,如果下行趨勢持續,機構可能面臨賣出opendoor technologies的壓力,這可能對個別投資者產生負面影響。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Opendoor Technologies.

在下面的圖表中,我們着重分析了opendoor technologies的不同持有群體。

big
NasdaqGS:OPEN Ownership Breakdown November 22nd 2024
納斯達克:OPEN 股東結構 2024年11月22日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Opendoor Technologies?

機構持股告訴我們關於opendoor technologies的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Opendoor Technologies already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Opendoor Technologies, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

opendoor technologies已經在股東名冊上有機構存在。 實際上,他們在公司的股份佔有相當的份額。這可以表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽。然而,依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證最好保持警惕。他們有時也會出錯。如果兩位大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一隻股票,出現大幅股價下跌並不少見。因此,查看opendoor technologies的過去盈餘軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,值得記住的是,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:OPEN Earnings and Revenue Growth November 22nd 2024
納斯達克GS:OPEN 盈利和營業收入增長 2024年11月22日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Opendoor Technologies. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Access Industries, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.5%. Furthermore, CEO Carrie Wheeler is the owner of 2.0% of the company's shares.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。對沖基金在opendoor technologies 的持股不多。目前,先鋒集團(Vanguard Group, Inc.)是公司最大的股東,持有12%的流通股。第二和第三大股東分別是Access Industries, Inc.和BlackRock, Inc.,他們的持股比例相等,均爲7.5%。此外,首席執行官卡麗·惠勒(Carrie Wheeler)持有公司2.0%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前15名股東在公司中擁有50%的組合持股,這表明沒有單一的股東對公司擁有重大控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Opendoor Technologies

opendoor technologies 的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Opendoor Technologies Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$38m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以報告,內部人士確實擁有opendoor technologies的股份。 這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的利益一致性通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有約3800萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。 大多數人會說這顯示了股東與董事會之間的利益一致性。不過,還是值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 34% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通大衆,包括零售投資者,持有該公司34%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這樣的持有量不足以左右政策決策方向,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 7.5%, of the Opendoor Technologies stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

似乎私人公司持有opendoor technologies的7.5%的股票。私人公司可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過持有私人公司的股份而不是以個人身份在上市公司中擁有興趣。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這個領域需要進一步研究。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Opendoor Technologies is showing 5 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

我覺得研究誰真正擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,opendoor technologies在我們的投資分析中顯示出5個警告信號,您應該了解...

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論