Washington, D.C.--(Newsfile Corp. - November 22, 2024) - The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced settled charges against United Parcel Service Inc. for materially misrepresenting its earnings because it failed to follow generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in valuing one of its worst performing businesses.
According to the SEC's order, UPS determined in 2019 that UPS Freight, a business unit that transported less-than-truckload shipments, was likely to sell for no more than about $650 million. GAAP required UPS to use the price it would receive to sell Freight in calculating whether it needed to write-down the value of the goodwill it had assigned to the business unit on its balance sheet. UPS's own analysis indicated that nearly $500 million of goodwill it had associated with Freight was impaired. Rather than use that analysis, however, UPS relied on an outside consultant's valuation of Freight without giving the consultant information necessary to conduct a fair valuation of the business. Using assumptions approved by UPS, which were clearly not ones a prospective buyer of Freight would make, the consultant estimated Freight was worth about $2 billion – three times as much as UPS had determined. On that basis, UPS did not record a goodwill impairment in 2019. Had UPS properly valued Freight, its earnings and other reported items would have been materially lower.
The SEC's order also alleges that, in 2020, UPS entered into a non-binding term sheet to sell Freight for $800 million with adjustments to be made later that were likely to reduce the final price. Despite its own analysis and its entry into this term sheet, UPS relied again on a consultant's valuation of Freight in 2020 to support not impairing the business's goodwill. UPS also did not inform the consultant of the term sheet. As in 2019, the consultant relied on assumptions from UPS that were clearly not ones a prospective buyer would make. Like the prior year, had UPS properly valued Freight and impaired goodwill, its earnings and other reported items would have been materially lower.
"Goodwill balances provide investors with valuable insight into whether companies are successfully operating the businesses they own," said Melissa Hodgman, Associate Director. "Therefore, it is essential for companies to prepare reliable fair value estimates and impair goodwill when required. UPS fell short of these obligations, repeatedly ignoring its own well-founded sale price estimates for Freight in favor of unreliable third-party valuations."
The SEC's order finds that UPS violated Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Securities Act, the reporting, book and records, internal accounting controls, and disclosure controls provisions of the Exchange Act, and various related rules. In addition to the civil penalty, UPS, without admitting or denying the SEC's findings, agreed to cease and desist from further violations of these provisions, adopt training requirements for certain officers, directors, and employees, and retain an independent compliance consultant to review and make recommendations about the company's fair value estimates and disclosure obligations.
The SEC's investigation, which is continuing, was conducted by Joseph Zambuto, Jr. and supervised by Assistant Director Rami Sibay.
華盛頓特區--(Newsfile Corp.,2024年11月22日)——美國證券交易委員會今天宣佈了對聯合包裹服務公司的和解指控,理由是該公司在對錶現最差的業務之一進行估值時未能遵循公認的會計原則(GAAP),該公司嚴重虛報了收益。
根據美國證券交易委員會的命令,UPS在2019年確定,運送零卡車貨物的業務部門UPS Freight的售價可能不超過約6.5億美元。GAAP要求UPS使用出售運費時將獲得的價格來計算是否需要減記其資產負債表上分配給該業務部門的商譽的價值。UPS自己的分析表明,其與貨運相關的近5億美元商譽受到減值。但是,UPS沒有使用這種分析,而是依賴外部顧問對貨運的估值,而沒有向顧問提供對業務進行公允估值所必需的信息。根據UPS批准的假設,該顧問估計,運費的價值約爲20億美元,是UPS確定的三倍,這些假設顯然不是貨運的潛在買家會做出的假設。在此基礎上,UPS在2019年沒有記錄商譽減值。如果UPS對貨運進行了適當的估值,其收入和其他報告的項目就會大大降低。
美國證券交易委員會的命令還稱,2020年,UPS簽訂了一份不具約束力的條款表,以8億美元的價格出售運費,稍後將進行調整,這可能會降低最終價格。儘管進行了自己的分析並寫入了本條款表,但UPS在2020年再次依賴顧問對貨運的估值來支持不損害企業的商譽。UPS也沒有將條款表告知顧問。與2019年一樣,該顧問依賴UPS的假設,這些假設顯然不是潛在買家會做出的假設。與去年一樣,如果UPS對運費和商譽減值進行了適當的估值,其收益和其他報告的項目將大大降低。
副董事梅利莎·霍奇曼說:「商譽餘額爲投資者提供了寶貴的見解,讓他們了解公司是否成功經營了所擁有的業務。」「因此,公司必須編制可靠的公允價值估算,並在需要時損害商譽。UPS未能履行這些義務,一再無視自己有充分根據的貨運銷售價格估計,轉而採用不可靠的第三方估值。」
美國證券交易委員會的命令認定,UPS違反了《證券法》第17(a)(2)和(3)條、《交易法》的報告、賬簿和記錄、內部會計控制和披露控制條款以及各種相關規則。除了民事處罰外,UPS在不承認或否認美國證券交易委員會的調查結果的情況下,同意停止和停止進一步違反這些規定的行爲,對某些高管、董事和員工採用培訓要求,並聘請獨立合規顧問來審查公司的公允價值估算和披露義務並提出建議。
美國證券交易委員會的調查仍在繼續,由小約瑟夫·贊布托進行,由助理董事拉米·西貝監督。