The Recent CN¥401m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Quick Intelligent Equipment Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:603203)
The Recent CN¥401m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Quick Intelligent Equipment Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:603203)
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significant insider control over Quick Intelligent EquipmentLtd implies vested interests in company growth
- The top 2 shareholders own 55% of the company
- Institutions own 11% of Quick Intelligent EquipmentLtd
- 對Quick Intelligent EquipmentLTD的重大內部控制意味着公司增長中的既得利益
- 前兩名股東擁有公司55%的股份
- 機構擁有快克智能設備有限公司11%的股份
A look at the shareholders of Quick Intelligent Equipment Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:603203) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 34% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看看快克智能裝備股份有限公司的股東, Ltd.(上海證券交易所代碼:603203)可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。個人內部人士擁有34%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。
And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 6.4%.
上週,由於該股下跌了6.4%,內部人士遭受了最大的損失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Quick Intelligent EquipmentLtd.
在下圖中,我們放大了快克智能設備有限公司的不同所有權組。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Quick Intelligent EquipmentLtd?
關於快克智能設備有限公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
We can see that Quick Intelligent EquipmentLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Quick Intelligent EquipmentLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到,Quick Intelligent EquipmentLTD確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看Quick Intelligent EquipmentLTD過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Quick Intelligent EquipmentLtd. The company's largest shareholder is Changzhou Fuyun Investment Consulting Co., Ltd., with ownership of 30%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 25% and 8.5% of the stock. Guo Qiang Qi, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.
我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對快克智能設備有限公司進行有意義的投資。公司的最大股東是常州富雲投資諮詢有限公司,持股30%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約25%和8.5%的股份。第三大股東郭強奇也恰好擁有董事會成員的頭銜。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Quick Intelligent EquipmentLtd
快克智能設備有限公司的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Quick Intelligent Equipment Co.,Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥2.0b stake in this CN¥5.9b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
看來內部人士擁有快克智能設備有限公司的很大一部分股份。,有限公司。業內人士持有這項59元人民幣的業務20元的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司23%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 32%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的32%。僅從這一事實中很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究一下誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過獨立的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Quick Intelligent EquipmentLtd (at least 1 which is significant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向Quick Intelligent EquipmentLTD確定了兩個警告信號(至少一個很重要),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。