The Recent CN¥795m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Wanma Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300698)
The Recent CN¥795m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Wanma Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300698)
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Wanma Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- The top 4 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 萬馬科技的顯著內部持股表明對公司擴展的內在利益
- 前四大股東持有公司51%的股份
- 分析師的預測以及持有數據有助於強烈理解業務的前景
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Wanma Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300698), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 57% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正掌控着萬馬科技有限公司(SZSE:300698),了解公司的所有權結構是很重要的。我們可以看到,個別內部人士擁有該公司57%的股份。這意味着,如果股票上漲,這個集團將獲得最大的收益(或者在下跌時損失最多)。
As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥795m.
因此,內部人士作爲一個整體在市值下降了79500萬人民幣後遭受了最高的損失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Wanma Technology.
在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於萬馬科技的不同股權結構。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Wanma Technology?
機構持股對萬馬科技的意義是什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
Less than 5% of Wanma Technology is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.
萬馬科技的持股機構投資者不到5%。這表明一些基金將公司納入了視野,但許多基金尚未買入股票。因此,如果公司自身能夠隨着時間的推移而改善,未來我們可能會看到更多的機構買家。當多個機構投資者想要買入股票時,我們通常會看到股價上漲。過去的營業收入軌跡(如下所示)可以作爲未來增長的指標,但並沒有保證。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Wanma Technology. Our data shows that Desheng Zhang is the largest shareholder with 22% of shares outstanding. With 15% and 9.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Tao Sheng and Heyang Zhang are the second and third largest shareholders. Heyang Zhang, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.
對沖基金在萬馬科技的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,張德生是最大股東,持有22%的流通股份。陶勝和張和陽分別以15%和9.2%的流通股份位列第二和第三大股東。作爲第三大股東的張和陽恰好還擔任董事長。
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 51% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
我們的研究還揭示了大約51%的公司由前四大股東控制,這表明這些股東對業務有顯著影響力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構的持有情況是判斷和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。目前有合理數量的分析師在覆蓋此股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有用。
Insider Ownership Of Wanma Technology
萬馬科技的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人的精確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員都是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或首席執行官的情況下。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Wanma Technology Co., Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of CN¥4.9b, that means they have CN¥2.8b worth of shares. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看來內幕人士持有萬馬科技有限公司超過一半的股票。這給了他們很大的權力。鑑於其市值爲49億人民幣,這意味着他們持有價值28億人民幣的股份。大多數人會認爲這是積極的,顯示出與股東的強烈一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內幕人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 40% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Wanma Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
持有40%股份的公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對於萬馬科技有一定的影響力。這種持股規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Wanma Technology (at least 1 which is concerning) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。 例如,投資風險始終存在。 我們發現了萬馬科技的3個警告信號(至少有1個令人擔憂),理解這些信號應該是您投資過程的一部分。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。