share_log

Do CMS Energy's (NYSE:CMS) Earnings Warrant Your Attention?

Do CMS Energy's (NYSE:CMS) Earnings Warrant Your Attention?

CMS能源的(紐交所:康哲藥業)盈利是否值得關注?
Simply Wall St ·  11/23 20:51

For beginners, it can seem like a good idea (and an exciting prospect) to buy a company that tells a good story to investors, even if it currently lacks a track record of revenue and profit. Unfortunately, these high risk investments often have little probability of ever paying off, and many investors pay a price to learn their lesson. Loss-making companies are always racing against time to reach financial sustainability, so investors in these companies may be taking on more risk than they should.

對於初學者來說,收購一家向投資者講述好故事的公司似乎是個好主意(也是一個令人興奮的前景),即使該公司目前缺乏收入和利潤記錄。不幸的是,這些高風險投資通常幾乎不可能獲得回報,許多投資者爲吸取教訓付出了代價。虧損的公司總是與時間賽跑以實現財務可持續性,因此這些公司的投資者承擔的風險可能超出了應有的範圍。

So if this idea of high risk and high reward doesn't suit, you might be more interested in profitable, growing companies, like CMS Energy (NYSE:CMS). Even if this company is fairly valued by the market, investors would agree that generating consistent profits will continue to provide CMS Energy with the means to add long-term value to shareholders.

因此,如果這種高風險和高回報的想法不適合,你可能會對盈利、成長中的公司更感興趣,例如CMS Energy(紐約證券交易所代碼:CMS)。即使這家公司受到市場的公平估值,投資者也會同意,創造持續的利潤將繼續爲CMS Energy提供爲股東增加長期價值的手段。

How Fast Is CMS Energy Growing?

CMS 能源增長有多快?

If you believe that markets are even vaguely efficient, then over the long term you'd expect a company's share price to follow its earnings per share (EPS) outcomes. That makes EPS growth an attractive quality for any company. We can see that in the last three years CMS Energy grew its EPS by 9.4% per year. That growth rate is fairly good, assuming the company can keep it up.

如果你認爲市場的效率甚至含糊不清,那麼從長遠來看,你預計公司的股價將遵循其每股收益(EPS)的結果。這使得每股收益的增長對任何公司來說都是一種有吸引力的品質。我們可以看到,在過去三年中,CMS Energy的每股收益每年增長9.4%。假設公司能夠保持增長率,那麼這個增長率相當不錯。

It's often helpful to take a look at earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) margins, as well as revenue growth, to get another take on the quality of the company's growth. We note that while EBIT margins have improved from 17% to 22%, the company has actually reported a fall in revenue by 4.0%. That's not a good look.

查看利息和稅前收益(EBIT)利潤率以及收入增長通常會很有幫助,這樣可以重新了解公司的增長質量。我們注意到,儘管息稅前利潤率從17%提高到22%,但該公司實際上報告的收入下降了4.0%。這不是一個好看。

You can take a look at the company's revenue and earnings growth trend, in the chart below. For finer detail, click on the image.

您可以在下表中查看該公司的收入和收益增長趨勢。要了解更多細節,請點擊圖片。

big
NYSE:CMS Earnings and Revenue History November 23rd 2024
紐約證券交易所:CMS 收益和收入歷史記錄 2024 年 11 月 23 日

Of course the knack is to find stocks that have their best days in the future, not in the past. You could base your opinion on past performance, of course, but you may also want to check this interactive graph of professional analyst EPS forecasts for CMS Energy.

當然,訣竅是找到未來表現最好的股票,而不是過去的股票。當然,你可以根據過去的表現來發表自己的看法,但你可能還需要查看這張專業分析師對CMS Energy每股收益預測的互動圖表。

Are CMS Energy Insiders Aligned With All Shareholders?

CMS 能源內部人士是否與所有股東保持一致?

Since CMS Energy has a market capitalisation of US$21b, we wouldn't expect insiders to hold a large percentage of shares. But we do take comfort from the fact that they are investors in the company. Indeed, they have a considerable amount of wealth invested in it, currently valued at US$109m. This comes in at 0.5% of shares in the company, which is a fair amount of a business of this size. So despite their percentage holding being low, company management still have plenty of reasons to deliver the best outcomes for investors.

由於CMS Energy的市值爲210億美元,我們預計內部人士不會持有很大比例的股份。但是,他們是公司的投資者,這確實令我們感到欣慰。事實上,他們有大量財富投資於此,目前價值1.09億美元。這佔該公司股份的0.5%,對於如此規模的企業來說,這是一個相當大的數目。因此,儘管他們的持股比例很低,但公司管理層仍然有充足的理由爲投資者帶來最佳結果。

While it's always good to see some strong conviction in the company from insiders through heavy investment, it's also important for shareholders to ask if management compensation policies are reasonable. Well, based on the CEO pay, you'd argue that they are indeed. For companies with market capitalisations over US$8.0b, like CMS Energy, the median CEO pay is around US$13m.

儘管通過大量投資看到內部人士對公司抱有堅定的信心總是件好事,但股東詢問管理層薪酬政策是否合理也很重要。好吧,根據首席執行官的薪酬,你會認爲確實如此。對於市值超過80億美元的公司,例如CMS Energy,首席執行官的薪酬中位數約爲1300萬美元。

CMS Energy's CEO took home a total compensation package worth US$9.6m in the year leading up to December 2023. That comes in below the average for similar sized companies and seems pretty reasonable. CEO remuneration levels are not the most important metric for investors, but when the pay is modest, that does support enhanced alignment between the CEO and the ordinary shareholders. It can also be a sign of good governance, more generally.

在截至2023年12月的一年中,CMS Energy的首席執行官獲得了價值960萬美元的總薪酬待遇。這低於類似規模公司的平均水平,而且似乎相當合理。首席執行官薪酬水平並不是投資者最重要的指標,但是當薪酬適度時,這確實支持加強首席執行官與普通股東之間的協調。更籠統地說,它也可以是善治的標誌。

Does CMS Energy Deserve A Spot On Your Watchlist?

CMS Energy值得在您的關注清單上佔有一席之地嗎?

One important encouraging feature of CMS Energy is that it is growing profits. The growth of EPS may be the eye-catching headline for CMS Energy, but there's more to bring joy for shareholders. With a meaningful level of insider ownership, and reasonable CEO pay, a reasonable mind might conclude that this is one stock worth watching. Even so, be aware that CMS Energy is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is a bit unpleasant...

CMS Energy的一個重要令人鼓舞的特點是利潤不斷增長。每股收益的增長可能是CMS Energy引人注目的頭條新聞,但還有更多可以爲股東帶來歡樂。有了可觀的內部所有權水平和合理的首席執行官薪酬,理智的人可能會得出結論,這是一隻值得關注的股票。即便如此,請注意,CMS Energy在我們的投資分析中顯示了4個警告信號,其中一個有點令人不快...

Although CMS Energy certainly looks good, it may appeal to more investors if insiders were buying up shares. If you like to see companies with more skin in the game, then check out this handpicked selection of companies that not only boast of strong growth but have strong insider backing.

儘管CMS Energy看起來確實不錯,但如果內部人士買入股票,它可能會吸引更多的投資者。如果你想看到擁有更多風險的公司,那麼看看這些精心挑選的公司,這些公司不僅擁有強勁的增長,而且有強大的內部支持。

Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction.

請注意,本文中討論的內幕交易是指相關司法管轄區內應報告的交易。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論