Here's Why Targa Resources (NYSE:TRGP) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden
Here's Why Targa Resources (NYSE:TRGP) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We can see that Targa Resources Corp. (NYSE:TRGP) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
傳奇基金經理李露(由查理·芒格支持)曾經說過:「最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受永久的資本損失。」因此,當你評估公司的風險時,看來聰明的貨幣知道債務(通常涉及破產)是一個非常重要的因素。我們可以看到,塔爾加資源公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:TRGP)確實在其業務中使用了債務。但是,股東是否應該擔心其債務的使用?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來什麼風險?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
一般而言,只有當公司無法通過籌集資金或用自己的現金流輕鬆還清債務時,債務才會成爲真正的問題。最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能會一無所獲。但是,更頻繁(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司必須以低廉的價格發行股票,永久稀釋股東,以支撐其資產負債表。當然,債務的好處在於它通常代表廉價資本,尤其是當它以高回報率進行再投資的能力取代公司的稀釋時。在考慮企業使用多少債務時,要做的第一件事是同時考慮其現金和債務。
What Is Targa Resources's Net Debt?
Targa Resources的淨負債是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 Targa Resources had US$14.0b of debt, an increase on US$12.6b, over one year. Net debt is about the same, since the it doesn't have much cash.
你可以點擊下圖查看歷史數字,但它顯示,截至2024年9月,Targa Resources在一年內有140億美元的債務,比126億美元有所增加。淨負債大致相同,因爲它沒有太多現金。
How Strong Is Targa Resources' Balance Sheet?
Targa Resources的資產負債表有多強?
The latest balance sheet data shows that Targa Resources had liabilities of US$2.63b due within a year, and liabilities of US$14.8b falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$127.2m and US$1.30b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$16.0b.
最新的資產負債表數據顯示,Targa Resources的負債爲26.3億美元,此後到期的負債爲148億美元。另一方面,它有1.272億美元的現金和價值13.0億美元的應收賬款將在一年內到期。因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收賬款總額160億美元。
Targa Resources has a very large market capitalization of US$45.3b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.
Targa Resources的市值非常大,爲453億美元,因此,如果需要,它很可能會籌集資金以改善其資產負債表。但很明顯,我們一定要仔細研究它能否在不稀釋的情況下管理債務。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我們通過以下方法來衡量公司的債務負擔與其盈利能力:將其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),並計算其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)支付利息支出(利息保障)的難易程度。這樣,我們既考慮債務的絕對數量,也考慮爲債務支付的利率。
Targa Resources's debt is 3.4 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 3.4 times over. This suggests that while the debt levels are significant, we'd stop short of calling them problematic. Fortunately, Targa Resources grew its EBIT by 3.5% in the last year, slowly shrinking its debt relative to earnings. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Targa Resources can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
Targa Resources的債務是其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的3.4倍,其息稅前利潤支付了3.4倍的利息支出。這表明,儘管債務水平很高,但我們不會稱其爲有問題。幸運的是,Targa Resources去年將其息稅前利潤增長了3.5%,其債務相對於收益的比例逐漸減少。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到的關於債務的知識最多。但最終,該業務的未來盈利能力將決定Targa Resources能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, Targa Resources's free cash flow amounted to 34% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.
最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤根本無法減少債務。因此,我們總是檢查該息稅前利潤中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。在過去三年中,Targa Resources的自由現金流佔其息稅前利潤的34%,低於我們的預期。在償還債務方面,這並不好。
Our View
我們的觀點
Both Targa Resources's interest cover and its net debt to EBITDA were discouraging. But its not so bad at growing its EBIT. When we consider all the factors discussed, it seems to us that Targa Resources is taking some risks with its use of debt. While that debt can boost returns, we think the company has enough leverage now. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Targa Resources that you should be aware of.
Targa Resources的利息覆蓋範圍及其佔息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的淨負債都令人沮喪。但它在增長息稅前利潤方面還不錯。當我們考慮所討論的所有因素時,在我們看來,Targa Resources在使用債務方面正在冒一些風險。儘管這筆債務可以提高回報,但我們認爲該公司現在有足夠的槓桿作用。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但歸根結底,每家公司都可以控制資產負債表之外存在的風險。例如,我們已經確定了Targa Resources的3個警告信號,你應該注意這些信號。
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
當然,如果你是那種喜歡在沒有債務負擔的情況下購買股票的投資者,那麼請立即查看我們的獨家淨現金增長股票清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。