China Design Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603018) Surges 8.6%; Retail Investors Who Own 59% Shares Profited Along With Insiders
China Design Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603018) Surges 8.6%; Retail Investors Who Own 59% Shares Profited Along With Insiders
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in China Design Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 25 shareholders own 39% of the company
- 20% of China Design Group is held by insiders
- 散戶投資者對中國設計集團的大量所有權表明,他們在管理和業務戰略方面集體擁有更大的發言權
- 前 25 名股東擁有公司 39% 的股份
- 中國設計集團20%的股份由內部人士持有
A look at the shareholders of China Design Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603018) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 59% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看中國設計集團有限公司(SHSE: 603018)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,散戶投資者擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲59%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Following a 8.6% increase in the stock price last week, retail investors profited the most, but insiders who own 20% stock also stood to gain from the increase.
繼上週股價上漲8.6%之後,散戶投資者獲利最多,但擁有20%股票的內部人士也將從漲幅中獲益。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about China Design Group.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於中國設計集團的哪些信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Design Group?
關於中國設計集團,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in China Design Group. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at China Design Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
如你所見,機構投資者在中國設計集團中擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看中國設計集團的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
China Design Group is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is First Seafront Fund Management Co., Ltd with 5.8% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 4.2% and 4.0% of the stock. Wei Dong Yang, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.
中國設計集團不歸對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是第一海濱基金管理有限公司,其已發行股份佔5.8%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約4.2%和4.0%的股份。第三大股東楊衛東也恰好擁有董事會主席的頭銜。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
在研究我們的所有權數據時,我們發現25位大股東共同擁有的股份不到50%,這意味着沒有一個人擁有多數股權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of China Design Group
中國設計集團的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of China Design Group Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥1.3b stake in this CN¥6.3b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有中國設計集團有限公司合理比例的股份。業內人士持有這項63元人民幣的業務13元的股份。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 59% stake in China Design Group, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有中國設計集團59%的大量股份,這表明中國設計集團是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。這種所有權水平賦予了廣大公衆的投資者一定的權力,可以影響董事會組成、高管薪酬和股息支付率等關鍵政策決策。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand China Design Group better, we need to consider many other factors.
擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解中國設計集團,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問這張過去的收益、收入和現金流的交互式圖表。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。