Shanghai Fortune Techgroup Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300493) Last Week's 8.0% Decline Must Have Disappointed Individual Investors Who Have a Significant Stake
Shanghai Fortune Techgroup Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300493) Last Week's 8.0% Decline Must Have Disappointed Individual Investors Who Have a Significant Stake
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in Shanghai Fortune Techgroup indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 45% ownership
- Institutional ownership in Shanghai Fortune Techgroup is 17%
- 在潤欣科技中,個人投資者的相當所有權表明他們在管理和業務策略上集體擁有更大的發言權。
- 該公司共有25位投資者,持股比例爲45%。
- 潤欣科技的機構持股爲17%。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shanghai Fortune Techgroup Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300493), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 55% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制潤欣科技有限公司(深交所代碼:300493),了解企業的所有權結構是很重要的。而持有最大份額的群體是擁有55%股份的個人投資者。換句話說,該群體從對公司的投資中獲益最多(或損失最多)。
As market cap fell to CN¥7.3b last week, individual investors would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
隨着市場市值在上週下降至73億人民幣,個人投資者面臨的損失比公司的其他股東群體都要大。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shanghai Fortune Techgroup, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入分析潤欣科技的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Fortune Techgroup?
機構所有權告訴我們關於潤欣科技的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shanghai Fortune Techgroup. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shanghai Fortune Techgroup, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在潤欣科技中擁有相當大的股份。這表明專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩位大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股票價格大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看潤欣科技過去的收益軌跡是值得的(如下)。當然,記得還有其他因素需要考慮。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shanghai Fortune Techgroup. Our data shows that Shanghai Fortune Information Technology Co., Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 21% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.9% and 5.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
對沖基金在潤欣科技的持股不多。我們的數據表明,潤欣信息科技有限公司是最大股東,持有21%的流通股。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有5.9%和5.0%的流通股。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以了解風向正在往哪裏吹。雖然有一些分析師對該股票進行了覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它可能仍然會變得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Fortune Techgroup
潤欣科技的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Shanghai Fortune Techgroup Co., Ltd.. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around CN¥50m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人士在潤欣科技有限公司的持股比例不到1%。不過,我們注意到,內部人士可能通過私人公司或其他公司結構間接持有股份。它是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份是可能的,儘管他們所擁有的比例不多。在這種情況下,他們持有大約5000萬人民幣的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員擁有股票是件好事,但檢查那些內部人士是否一直在買入也是值得的。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 55% of Shanghai Fortune Techgroup. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
公衆 -- 包括散戶投資者 -- 持有55%的潤欣科技。這種持股比例使得公衆投資者能夠集體行使一定的權力。他們能夠並可能會影響高管薪酬、股息政策和擬議的業務收購的決定。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 27%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有該公司的27%股份。私人公司可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過控股私人公司而不是以個人身份來擁有公共公司的利益。儘管很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Shanghai Fortune Techgroup (including 1 which is significant) .
我發現觀察誰真正擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該了解我們發現的潤欣科技的2個警告信號(其中1個是重要的)。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。