share_log

Hitevision Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002955) Market Cap Increased by CN¥655m, Insiders Receive a 38% Cut

Hitevision Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002955) Market Cap Increased by CN¥655m, Insiders Receive a 38% Cut

海信視像股份有限公司(SZSE:002955)的市值增加了65500萬元人民幣,內部人士獲得38%的分成
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/26 08:32

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significant insider control over Hitevision implies vested interests in company growth
  • The top 4 shareholders own 54% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in Hitevision is 18%
  • 對鴻合科技的顯著內部控制意味着對公司增長的既得利益。
  • 前四大股東持有公司54%的股份。
  • 鴻合科技的機構持股比例爲18%。

Every investor in Hitevision Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002955) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 38% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

每位鴻合科技(深圳證券交易所代碼:002955)的投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,個人內部人士在公司中擁有最大的股份,達到38%的持股比例。也就是說,如果股票上漲,這個團體將獲得最大的利益(如果出現下跌則損失最多)。

Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥655m last week.

顯然,在公司市值上週增加了人民幣65500萬後,內部人士獲益最多。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Hitevision.

在下方的圖表中,我們仔細查看了鴻合科技的不同持股群體。

big
SZSE:002955 Ownership Breakdown November 26th 2024
SZSE:002955 持股分佈 2024年11月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hitevision?

機構持股告訴我們關於鴻合科技什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hitevision. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Hitevision, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所見,機構投資者在鴻合科技中擁有相當一部分股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經關注了這隻股票並對其產生了興趣。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時賣出一隻股票,出現大幅價格下跌的情況並不罕見。因此,查看鴻合科技過去的營業收入軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
SZSE:002955 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 26th 2024
深交所:002955 2024年11月26日的收益和營業收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Hitevision. The company's largest shareholder is Hongfu Victory Company Limited, with ownership of 18%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 15% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 11% by the third-largest shareholder. Jing Wang, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

我們注意到對沖基金在鴻合科技沒有顯著投資。公司的最大股東是鴻富勝有限公司,持股18%。作爲對比,第二大股東持有大約15%的流通股,第三大股東則持有11%。第三大股東王靜也是董事會成員。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 54% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示了大約54%的公司由前四大股東控制,這表明這些股東對業務擁有顯著的影響力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師情緒也可以實現這一點。雖然有一些分析師的研究覆蓋,但公司的覆蓋範圍可能不廣。因此,未來可能會獲得更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Hitevision

鴻合科技的內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人的精確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員都是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或首席執行官的情況下。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Hitevision Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥2.5b stake in this CN¥6.5b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內幕人士持有鴻合科技一個合理的股份比例。內幕人士在這個市值爲65億人民幣的業務中持有25億人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量的股票。您可以點擊這裏查看他們是否有買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有該公司27%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這樣的股權比例可能不足以影響有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 18%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有該公司18%的股份。私營公司可能是相關方。有時,內部人士可能通過持有私營公司的股份與一家上市公司有關聯,而不是以個人身份。雖然很難得出廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是這是一個進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得研究到底是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

許多人發現深入分析公司過去的表現很有用。您可以訪問這一詳細的歷史營業收入、營業收入和現金流的圖表。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論