Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Traeger, Inc. (NYSE:COOK) With 36% Ownership
Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Traeger, Inc. (NYSE:COOK) With 36% Ownership
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Traeger implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 3 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 機構對Traeger的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
- 前三名股東擁有公司50%的股份
- 使用分析師預測的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現
If you want to know who really controls Traeger, Inc. (NYSE:COOK), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 36% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制了Traeger, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:COOK),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲36%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$385m in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 41%.
上週,在該公司的市值達到3.85億美元之後,機構投資者最終受益最大。上週的漲勢將進一步提振目前爲41%的股東一年回報率。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Traeger.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Traeger的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Traeger?
關於Traeger,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。
Traeger already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Traeger's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Traeger已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Traeger的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Traeger. AEA Investors LP is currently the largest shareholder, with 26% of shares outstanding. With 19% and 5.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board and Jeremy Andrus are the second and third largest shareholders. Jeremy Andrus, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.
對沖基金在Traeger中的股票不多。AEA Investors LP目前是最大股東,已發行股份的26%。安大略省教師養老金計劃委員會和傑里米·安德魯斯分別擁有19%和5.9%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。第三大股東傑里米·安德魯斯也恰好擁有董事會主席的頭銜。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 50% stake.
對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,前三名股東通過其50%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Traeger
Traeger 的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Traeger, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$28m worth of the US$385m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有Traeger, Inc.的股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有這家3.85億美元公司的價值2800萬美元。這至少顯示出一定的對齊性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 24% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Traeger. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
Traeger擁有24%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對Traeger有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股權所有權
Private equity firms hold a 26% stake in Traeger. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
私募股權公司持有特雷格26%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 6.8%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司6.8%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Traeger , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,以永遠存在的投資風險幽靈爲例。我們已經向Traeger確定了1個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。