Great Week for ThredUp Inc. (NASDAQ:TDUP) Institutional Investors After Losing 21% Over the Previous Year
Great Week for ThredUp Inc. (NASDAQ:TDUP) Institutional Investors After Losing 21% Over the Previous Year
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, ThredUp's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Insiders have been buying lately
- 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,ThredUp的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
- 共有9名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
- 內部人士最近一直在買入
To get a sense of who is truly in control of ThredUp Inc. (NASDAQ:TDUP), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 49% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制了ThredUP Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:TDUP),了解業務的所有權結構很重要。機構擁有49%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 58% increase in the share price after a year of 21% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.
在經歷了21%的虧損之後,上週股價上漲了58%,這表明回報可能開始呈上升趨勢,機構投資者可能會對此表示歡迎。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about ThredUp.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於ThredUp的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ThredUp?
關於thredUp,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。
We can see that ThredUp does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of ThredUp, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到,ThredUp確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看ThredUp過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in ThredUp. The company's largest shareholder is Capital Research and Management Company, with ownership of 7.7%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.4% by the third-largest shareholder. Additionally, the company's CEO James Reinhart directly holds 3.9% of the total shares outstanding.
我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對ThredUp進行有意義的投資。該公司的最大股東是資本研究與管理公司,所有權爲7.7%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約6.7%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有6.4%的所有權。此外,該公司首席執行官詹姆斯·萊因哈特直接持有已發行股份總額的3.9%。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前9名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of ThredUp
ThredUp 的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in ThredUp Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$176m, and insiders have US$16m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board, though we generally prefer to see bigger insider holdings. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有ThredUp Inc.的股份。它的市值僅爲1.76億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值1600萬美元的股票。有人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致,儘管我們通常更願意看到更多的內部持股。但是,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司22%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股權所有權
With a stake of 19%, private equity firms could influence the ThredUp board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
私募股權公司持有19%的股份,可能會影響ThredUp董事會。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for ThredUp (1 is a bit unpleasant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了 thredUp 的 3 個警告信號(1 個有點不愉快!)在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。