Is FriendLtd (SHSE:605050) Using Too Much Debt?
Is FriendLtd (SHSE:605050) Using Too Much Debt?
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. As with many other companies Friend Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:605050) makes use of debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
有人說,波動性,而不是債務,是投資者思考風險的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾說過一句名言:「波動性遠非風險的代名詞。」當你檢查公司的資產負債表的風險時,考慮它的資產負債表是很自然的,因爲企業倒閉時通常會涉及債務。與許多其他公司一樣,Friend Co., Ltd.(上海證券交易所股票代碼:605050)使用債務。但是,股東是否應該擔心其債務的使用?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來什麼風險?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但是如果企業無法還清貸款人的債務,那麼債務就任其擺佈。資本主義的組成部分是 「創造性破壞」 過程,在這種過程中,倒閉的企業被銀行家無情地清算。但是,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司爲了控制債務,必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東。當然,許多公司使用債務爲增長提供資金,而不會產生任何負面影響。當我們考慮公司使用債務時,我們首先將現金和債務放在一起考慮。
What Is FriendLtd's Net Debt?
FriendLtd 的淨負債是多少?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at September 2024 FriendLtd had debt of CN¥1.52b, up from CN¥231.2m in one year. However, it also had CN¥1.12b in cash, and so its net debt is CN¥405.8m.
你可以點擊下圖查看更多細節,該圖片顯示,截至2024年9月,FriendLtd的債務爲15.2元人民幣,高於一年的23120萬加元。但是,它也有11.2元人民幣的現金,因此其淨負債爲40580萬元人民幣。
How Healthy Is FriendLtd's Balance Sheet?
FriendLtd 的資產負債表有多健康?
According to the last reported balance sheet, FriendLtd had liabilities of CN¥4.12b due within 12 months, and liabilities of CN¥30.4m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of CN¥1.12b as well as receivables valued at CN¥2.77b due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by CN¥263.0m.
根據上次報告的資產負債表,FriendLt的負債爲41.2元人民幣,在12個月內到期,負債爲3040萬元人民幣。除了這些債務外,它還有11.2元人民幣的現金以及價值27.7元人民幣的應收賬款將在12個月內到期。因此,其負債比其現金和(短期)應收賬款總額高出26300萬元人民幣。
Of course, FriendLtd has a market capitalization of CN¥5.15b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time.
當然,FriendLtd的市值爲51.5元人民幣,因此這些負債可能是可以控制的。但是,我們確實認爲值得關注其資產負債表的實力,因爲它可能會隨着時間的推移而發生變化。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
爲了擴大公司相對於收益的負債規模,我們計算其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),將其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)除以利息支出(利息保障)。因此,我們將債務與收益的關係考慮在內,包括和不包括折舊和攤銷費用。
FriendLtd's net debt is only 0.81 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 428 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. But the bad news is that FriendLtd has seen its EBIT plunge 11% in the last twelve months. If that rate of decline in earnings continues, the company could find itself in a tight spot. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is FriendLtd's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.
FriendLtd的淨負債僅爲其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的0.81倍。其息稅前利潤覆蓋了高達428倍的利息支出。因此,你可以爭辯說,它受到債務的威脅並不比大象受到老鼠的威脅更大。但壞消息是,在過去的十二個月中,FriendLtd的息稅前利潤下降了11%。如果收益的下降速度持續下去,該公司可能會陷入困境。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到的關於債務的知識最多。但是,影響未來資產負債表狀況的是FriendLtd的收益。因此,如果你想進一步了解其收益,可能值得看看這張長期收益趨勢圖。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, FriendLtd burned a lot of cash. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.
最後,儘管稅務人員可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受冷硬現金。因此,我們顯然需要研究該息稅前利潤是否會帶來相應的自由現金流。在過去的三年中,FriendLtd消耗了大量現金。儘管這可能是增長支出的結果,但它確實使債務風險大大增加。
Our View
我們的觀點
Neither FriendLtd's ability to convert EBIT to free cash flow nor its EBIT growth rate gave us confidence in its ability to take on more debt. But its interest cover tells a very different story, and suggests some resilience. We think that FriendLtd's debt does make it a bit risky, after considering the aforementioned data points together. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since leverage can boost returns on equity, but it is something to be aware of. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with FriendLtd (including 1 which is a bit concerning) .
FriendLTD將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流的能力及其息稅前利潤增長率都沒有使我們對它承擔更多債務的能力充滿信心。但是它的興趣封面講述了一個截然不同的故事,也表明了一定的韌性。綜合考慮上述數據點後,我們認爲FriendLtd的債務確實使其有點風險。這不一定是一件壞事,因爲槓桿可以提高股本回報率,但這是需要注意的事情。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但是,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。爲此,你應該了解我們在FriendLtd上發現的兩個警告信號(包括一個有點令人擔憂的警告)。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
歸根結底,通常最好專注於沒有淨負債的公司。您可以訪問我們的此類公司的特別名單(所有公司都有利潤增長的記錄)。它是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。