Zangge Mining's (SZSE:000408) Returns Have Hit A Wall
Zangge Mining's (SZSE:000408) Returns Have Hit A Wall
To find a multi-bagger stock, what are the underlying trends we should look for in a business? One common approach is to try and find a company with returns on capital employed (ROCE) that are increasing, in conjunction with a growing amount of capital employed. Put simply, these types of businesses are compounding machines, meaning they are continually reinvesting their earnings at ever-higher rates of return. However, after investigating Zangge Mining (SZSE:000408), we don't think it's current trends fit the mold of a multi-bagger.
要找到一個賺取多倍回報的股票,我們應該看哪些業務潛在趨勢?一個常見的方法是嘗試尋找一個ROCE不斷增長,資本投入增加的公司。簡單地說,這些類型的業務是複合機器,意味着他們不斷以越來越高的回報率再投資他們的盈利。然而,在調查藏格礦業(SZSE:000408)之後,我們認爲它目前的趨勢不符合多倍回報的模式。
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
資本利用率(ROCE)是什麼?
If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. To calculate this metric for Zangge Mining, this is the formula:
如果您之前沒有接觸過ROCE,它衡量了公司從業務中使用的資本所產生的'回報'(稅前利潤)。要爲藏格礦業計算這個指標,以下是公式:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資本利用率 = 利息和稅前利潤(EBIT) ÷ (總資產 - 流動負債)
0.077 = CN¥1.0b ÷ (CN¥14b - CN¥651m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.077 = 人民幣10億 ÷ (人民幣140億 - 人民幣651百萬)(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
Therefore, Zangge Mining has an ROCE of 7.7%. On its own that's a low return, but compared to the average of 5.4% generated by the Chemicals industry, it's much better.
因此,藏格礦業的ROCE爲7.7%。單獨看來這是一個低迴報,但與化學品行業的5.4%平均回報相比,要好得多。

In the above chart we have measured Zangge Mining's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for Zangge Mining .
在上面的圖表中,我們已經衡量了藏格礦業的先前ROCE與其先前表現,但未來可能更加重要。如果您想了解分析師對未來的預測,請查看我們針對藏格礦業的免費分析師報告。
How Are Returns Trending?
綜合上述,Cimpress非常有效地提高了其資本利用率所產生的回報。考慮到股票過去五年保持穩定,如果其他指標也不錯,則可能存在機會。因此,進一步研究這家公司並確定這些趨勢是否會持續是合理的。
The returns on capital haven't changed much for Zangge Mining in recent years. The company has employed 69% more capital in the last five years, and the returns on that capital have remained stable at 7.7%. Given the company has increased the amount of capital employed, it appears the investments that have been made simply don't provide a high return on capital.
近年來,藏格礦業的資本回報率並未發生太大變化。公司在過去五年中投入的資本增加了69%,而該資本的回報率仍穩定在7.7%。鑑於公司已增加了投入的資本金額,看起來所做的投資並未帶來高回報率。
One more thing to note, even though ROCE has remained relatively flat over the last five years, the reduction in current liabilities to 4.7% of total assets, is good to see from a business owner's perspective. This can eliminate some of the risks inherent in the operations because the business has less outstanding obligations to their suppliers and or short-term creditors than they did previously.
還有一點需要注意的是,儘管過去五年來ROCE基本保持不變,但將流動負債減少到總資產的4.7%是從業主的角度來看是好事。這可以消除一些與運營中固有風險,因爲與以前相比,企業與供應商或短期債權人的未償債務更少。
The Bottom Line
最終結論
In conclusion, Zangge Mining has been investing more capital into the business, but returns on that capital haven't increased. Investors must think there's better things to come because the stock has knocked it out of the park, delivering a 288% gain to shareholders who have held over the last five years. But if the trajectory of these underlying trends continue, we think the likelihood of it being a multi-bagger from here isn't high.
總之,藏格礦業一直在向業務投入更多資本,但該資本的回報率並未增加。投資者必須認爲未來會有更好的發展,因爲股票已經給股東帶來了288%的收益,這是在過去五年中持有的股東。但是如果這些潛在趨勢的軌跡持續下去,我們認爲從這裏開始成倍增長的可能性並不高。
On a separate note, we've found 1 warning sign for Zangge Mining you'll probably want to know about.
另外,我們發現藏格礦業有1個警告信號,您可能想了解。
For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.
對於喜歡投資穩健公司的人,請查看這份具有穩健資產負債表和高權益回報的公司免費列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。