Individual Investors Are Tofflon Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300171) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥411m
Individual Investors Are Tofflon Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300171) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥411m
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Tofflon Science and Technology Group by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
- Insiders own 36% of Tofflon Science and Technology Group
- 個人投資者對東富龍的重大控制意味着公衆在管理和治理相關決策上有更多的影響力。
- 前11名股東持有公司50%的股份。
- 內部人士持有東富龍36%的股份。
A look at the shareholders of Tofflon Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300171) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 47% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看東富龍科技集團有限公司(深交所:300171)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。我們可以看到,個人投資者在公司中擁有47%的股份。換句話說,這個群體在對公司的投資中獲得的收益最大(或者損失最大)。
Following a 4.1% decrease in the stock price last week, individual investors suffered the most losses, but insiders who own 36% stock also took a hit.
在上週股價下降4.1%之後,散戶投資者遭受了最大損失,但持有36%股份的內部人士也受到影響。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Tofflon Science and Technology Group.
在下圖中,我們深入了解東富龍的不同持股群體。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0291f/0291f0030b01f628e9706c8293d0954b7f08b0f0" alt="big"
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Tofflon Science and Technology Group?
機構持股對東富龍意味着什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Tofflon Science and Technology Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Tofflon Science and Technology Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到,東富龍確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司相當部分的股票。這可以表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好保持警惕,不要過於依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會出錯。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個參與者可能會競爭快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下方看到東富龍的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,事情總是有更多的故事。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f492/3f492a0b97b99db8c24981f63460488634ddd56d" alt="big"
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Tofflon Science and Technology Group. With a 34% stake, CEO Xiaodong Zheng is the largest shareholder. The second and third largest shareholders are CS Capital Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Biomedical Industry Equity Fund Management Co., Ltd., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 3.2%.
對東富龍的對沖基金持有的股份不多。 董事長鄭曉東持有34%的股份,是最大的股東。 第二和第三大股東分別是CS資本有限公司和上海生物醫藥行業股權基金管理有限公司,持股比例均爲3.2%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
在深入挖掘後,我們發現前11名股東在該公司擁有50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一的股東對公司擁有顯著的控制權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。研究分析師的看法也可以達到同樣的效果。股票的分析師覆蓋率很低,但不多。因此,可以有更多的空間來增加其覆蓋範圍。
Insider Ownership Of Tofflon Science and Technology Group
東富龍的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Tofflon Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥3.4b stake in this CN¥9.6b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起來內部人士擁有東富龍科技集團有限公司相當大比例的股份。 令人有趣的是,內部人士在這個96億人民幣的業務中持有意義非凡的34億人民幣的股份。 看到這樣的投資水平是件好事。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士是否最近有買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 47% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通大衆,包括零售投資者,在該公司持有47%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響政策決定的贊成意見,他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Tofflon Science and Technology Group (at least 1 which is a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他因素更加重要。比如,始終存在的投資風險。我們已經確定了東富龍的3個警示信號(至少有一個比較不愉快),了解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。