share_log

ArcSoft Corporation Limited (SHSE:688088) CEO Deng Hui, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 4.4% Reduction in Holdings Value

ArcSoft Corporation Limited (SHSE:688088) CEO Deng Hui, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 4.4% Reduction in Holdings Value

虹軟科技有限公司 (SHSE:688088) CEO鄧輝,公司的最大股東持有價值減少4.4%
Simply Wall St ·  11/27 14:41

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in ArcSoft's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 4 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 公司內部人士似乎對虹軟科技的增長有濃厚的興趣,他們擁有相當大比例的所有權。
  • 前4大股東擁有該公司的52%。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of ArcSoft Corporation Limited (SHSE:688088), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 35% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制着虹軟科技股份有限公司(SHSE:688088),重要的是要了解企業的所有權結構。持有最大股份的是擁有35%所有權的個人內部人士。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥609m.

結果,市值下跌了60900萬人民幣後,內部人士作爲一個團體遭受了最大的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of ArcSoft.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了虹軟科技的不同所有權群體。

big
SHSE:688088 Ownership Breakdown November 27th 2024
SHSE:688088所有權詳情2024年11月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ArcSoft?

機構持股告訴我們關於虹軟科技的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that ArcSoft does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see ArcSoft's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到虹軟科技確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司股份的相當一部分。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但我們不能單單依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構持有一支股票時,總會存在它們參與的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速賣出股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到虹軟科技的歷史收入和營業收入,但要記住,故事裏總是更多內容。

big
SHSE:688088 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 27th 2024
SHSE:688088在2024年11月27日的收益和營業收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in ArcSoft. With a 35% stake, CEO Deng Hui is the largest shareholder. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.7% by the third-largest shareholder.

對虹軟科技來說,對沖基金持有的股份不多。董事長鄧輝持有35%的股份,是最大的股東。爲了解情況,第二大股東持有約11%的流通股,第三大股東持有3.7%的股份。

On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步觀察發現,前四名股東持有52%的股份。換句話說,這些股東對該公司的決策有重要的發言權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of ArcSoft

虹軟科技的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of ArcSoft Corporation Limited. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥13b, and insiders have CN¥4.6b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有虹軟科技有限公司相當比例的股份。其市值僅爲130億人民幣,內部人士名下持有46億人民幣的股份,這相當重要。大多數人會很高興看到董事會也在與他們一起投資。您可能希望查看這張展示內部人士最近交易情況的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 34% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over ArcSoft. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公衆擁有虹軟科技的34%股份,主要是由個人投資者組成,對虹軟科技有一定程度的影響力。雖然持有這一比例的股份可能不足以影響公司政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 11%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有11%的股份,有望在價值創造方面發揮一定的作用。有時候我們看到私募股權公司會長揸一份股權,但一般來說,他們的投資週期比較短,就如其名稱所示,他們很少在上市公司進行投資。過一段時間後,他們可能會尋找賣出股份,將資本重新配置到其他項目上。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 9.9%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私營公司擁有已發行股份的9.9%。單單從這個事實本身很難得出任何結論,因此值得進一步了解擁有這些私營公司的是誰。有時內部人員或其他相關方可能通過另外一傢俬營公司持有公共公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for ArcSoft that you should be aware of.

我覺得了解一家公司的所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了虹軟科技存在 2 個警示信號,你應該注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論