Chinese Universe Publishing and Media Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600373) Stock Most Popular Amongst Private Companies Who Own 54%, While Individual Investors Hold 30%
Chinese Universe Publishing and Media Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600373) Stock Most Popular Amongst Private Companies Who Own 54%, While Individual Investors Hold 30%
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Chinese Universe Publishing and Media Group's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- Jiangxi Publishing and Media Group Co., Ltd. owns 54% of the company
- 16% of Chinese Universe Publishing and Media Group is held by Institutions
- 華人宇宙出版傳媒集團擁有大量私營公司所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
- 江西出版傳媒集團股份有限公司擁有該公司 54% 的股份
- 華人天地出版傳媒集團16%的股份由機構持有
If you want to know who really controls Chinese Universe Publishing and Media Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600373), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 54% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道誰真正控制着華宇出版傳媒集團有限公司(SHSE: 600373),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。私營公司擁有54%的股份,擁有該公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。
Individual investors, on the other hand, account for 30% of the company's stockholders.
另一方面,個人投資者佔公司股東的30%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Chinese Universe Publishing and Media Group.
在下圖中,我們放大了中文宇宙出版傳媒集團的不同所有權集團。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chinese Universe Publishing and Media Group?
關於華人天地出版傳媒集團,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。
Chinese Universe Publishing and Media Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Chinese Universe Publishing and Media Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
中國宇宙出版傳媒集團已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到中文宇宙出版傳媒集團的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Chinese Universe Publishing and Media Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Jiangxi Publishing and Media Group Co., Ltd. with 54% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 2.6% and 1.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對華宇出版傳媒集團進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大股東是江西出版傳媒集團有限公司,已發行股份的54%。這意味着他們對公司的未來擁有多數權益控制權。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的2.6%和1.5%。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Chinese Universe Publishing and Media Group
華人天地出版傳媒集團的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Chinese Universe Publishing and Media Group Co., Ltd.. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own CN¥92m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有的中文宇宙出版傳媒集團有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,內部人士有可能通過更復雜的結構獲得間接利益。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值9200萬元人民幣的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。看到至少有一部分內部所有權總是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 30% stake in Chinese Universe Publishing and Media Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有華人宇宙出版傳媒集團30%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 54%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司54%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Chinese Universe Publishing and Media Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Chinese Universe Publishing and Media Group , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解華宇出版傳媒集團,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向中文宇宙出版傳媒集團確定了兩個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。