Despite Recent Sales, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PRTH) Insiders Still Control 75% of the Company
Despite Recent Sales, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PRTH) Insiders Still Control 75% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over Priority Technology Holdings implies vested interests in company growth
- 61% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Thomas Priore)
- Insiders have been selling lately
- Priority Technology Holdings的重要內部控制意味着對公司增長利益的關注
- 公司61%的股份由單一股東(Thomas Priore)持有
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
A look at the shareholders of Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PRTH) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 75% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看一下Priority Technology Holdings,Inc.(納斯達克:PRTH)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。 我們可以看到個別內部持有公司75%的股份。 換句話說,該群體在他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最多)。
Insiders own the top position in the company's share registry despite recent sales and as a result, were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 12% gain.
儘管最近有股東出售,但內部人士仍佔據公司股份註冊的最高位置,因此成爲上週12%上漲的最大受益者。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Priority Technology Holdings.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注Priority Technology Holdings的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Priority Technology Holdings?
機構持股告訴我們有關Priority Technology Holdings的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that Priority Technology Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Priority Technology Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到Priority Technology Holdings確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的相當一部分。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經看過這支股票,而且他們很喜歡。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能出錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試出售某支股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查Priority Technology Holdings過去的盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Priority Technology Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO Thomas Priore is the largest shareholder with 61% of shares outstanding. This implies that they possess majority interests and have significant control over the company. Investors usually consider it a good sign when the company leadership has such a significant stake, as this is widely perceived to increase the chance that the management will act in the best interests of the company. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.7% by the third-largest shareholder.
Priority Technology Holdings不是由對沖基金持有。該公司的首席執行官Thomas Priore擁有61%的流通股,意味着他們擁有絕大多數權益並對公司有重要控制權。投資者通常認爲,當公司領導層擁有如此巨大的股份時,這是一個好跡象,因爲這被普遍認爲會增加管理層以公司最佳利益行事的機會。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約11%的流通股,其次是第三大股東持有6.7%的股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Priority Technology Holdings
優先科技控股公司的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of US$674m, that means they have US$509m worth of shares. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
似乎內部持有Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.股票超過一半。這賦予他們很大的權力。考慮到該公司的市值爲67400萬美元,這意味着他們持有價值50900萬美元的股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個積極的跡象,顯示與股東的強烈一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公衆(包括零售投資者)持有該公司12%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略它們。雖然這個群體不能決定一切,但是肯定會對公司的運營產生影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 6.7%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
擁有6.7%的股份,私募股權公司有機會在塑造公司策略方面發揮作用,專注於創造價值。有時我們會看到私募股權公司長期留下,但一般來說,他們的投資視野較短,不像名字暗示的那樣,在公共公司中投資很少。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售並將資本重新配置到其他地方。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Priority Technology Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Priority Technology Holdings (at least 1 which is a bit concerning) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
始終值得考慮公司中擁有股份的不同群體。但要更好地了解Priority Technology Holdings,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,考慮投資風險這個永遠存在的威脅。我們已經確定了Priority Technology Holdings的2個警示信號(至少有1個有點令人擔憂),了解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。