While Institutions Own 29% of Shandong Hi-Speed Holdings Group Limited (HKG:412), Private Companies Are Its Largest Shareholders With 43% Ownership
While Institutions Own 29% of Shandong Hi-Speed Holdings Group Limited (HKG:412), Private Companies Are Its Largest Shareholders With 43% Ownership
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by private companies in Shandong Hi-Speed Holdings Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 2 shareholders own 68% of the company
- Institutions own 29% of Shandong Hi-Speed Holdings Group
- 山東高速控股集團中私營公司擁有的大量股份意味着他們共同在管理和業務策略方面具有更大的發言權
- 前兩大股東擁有公司68%的股份
- 機構擁有山東高速控股集團29%的股份
A look at the shareholders of Shandong Hi-Speed Holdings Group Limited (HKG:412) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 43% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看山東高速控股集團有限公司(HKG:412)的股東,我們可以了解哪個群體最具權力。我們可以看到私營公司在公司中擁有43%的股份。換句話說,該群體面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)
Meanwhile, institutions make up 29% of the company's shareholders. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies.
同時,機構佔公司股東的29%。大公司通常有機構作爲股東,而我們通常會看到內部人持有較小公司的股份。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shandong Hi-Speed Holdings Group.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型股東可以告訴我們關於山東高速控股集團的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shandong Hi-Speed Holdings Group?
機構持股告訴我們關於山東高速控股集團的什麼信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shandong Hi-Speed Holdings Group. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Shandong Hi-Speed Holdings Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所見,機構投資者在山東高速控股集團中擁有相當大的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎依賴所謂與機構投資者相關的驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。 當多家機構持有某股時,總會存在它們在一種'擁擠的交易'中的風險。當這種交易出錯時,多個方可能競相快速出售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以查看山東高速控股集團的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事中總有更多內容。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shandong Hi-Speed Holdings Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Shandong High-Speed Group Co., Ltd. with 43% of shares outstanding. Harvest Fund Management Co. Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 25% of common stock, and HFT Investment Management Co. Ltd. (Group) holds about 2.0% of the company stock.
對山東高速控股集團的股東基金持股不高。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是山東高速集團有限公司,持有公司股份的43%。 Harvest基金管理有限公司是第二大股東,擁有25%的普通股,HFt投資管理有限公司(集團)持有約2.0%的公司股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但還是研究分析師的建議,以深入了解股票預期表現,是一個好習慣。就我們所知,該公司沒有分析師覆蓋,因此可能沒有引起注意。
Insider Ownership Of Shandong Hi-Speed Holdings Group
山東高速控股集團的內部股權所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is rare to see such a low level of personal ownership, amongst the board (and it is possible that our data might be incomplete). Concerned investors should check here to see if insiders have been selling or buying.
我們的數據無法確認董事會是否持有股份。在董事會中看到這麼低的個人持股水平是罕見的(而且我們的數據可能不完整)。關注的投資者應該在這裏查看內部人是否在出售或購買股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 28% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Shandong Hi-Speed Holdings Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
持有28%股權的普通大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對山東高速控股集團具有一定影響力。儘管擁有相當大的股權,但如果決策與其他大股東不協調,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 43%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到私人公司擁有已發行股份的43%。這可能值得更深入地挖掘。如果相關方,如內部人員,對其中一個私人公司感興趣,那麼應在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對該公司具有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄,你也可以免費訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營收和收益圖表。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。