share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Veeva Systems Inc. (NYSE:VEEV) With 81% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Veeva Systems Inc. (NYSE:VEEV) With 81% Ownership

機構投資者在veeva systems(紐交所:VEEV)上有很大賭注,持股比例達到81%。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/28 19:52

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Veeva Systems' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 19 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構擁有的股份佔比高意味着veeva systems的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感
  • 共有19位投資者擁有該公司51%的所有權
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

If you want to know who really controls Veeva Systems Inc. (NYSE:VEEV), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 81% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道誰真正控制着Veeva Systems Inc.(紐交所:VEEV),那麼您必須查看其股東名冊的構成。機構擁有81%的股份,是公司中持股最多的。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 7.7% last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 31% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

結果,上週公司股票價格上漲7.7%,機構投資者獲得最大回報。 目前投資回報率爲31%,上週的收益將受到更多歡迎。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Veeva Systems.

讓我們更近距離地看看不同類型的股東對Veeva Systems有何啓示。

big
NYSE:VEEV Ownership Breakdown November 28th 2024
紐交所:VEEV所有權拆分2024年11月28日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Veeva Systems?

機構持股對Veeva Systems有何啓示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Veeva Systems does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Veeva Systems, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Veeva Systems確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司的大部分股票。這可能表明公司在投資社區有一定的信譽度。然而,最好要警惕依賴所謂的機構投資者帶來的驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售一支股票,很常見看到股價大幅下跌。因此值得檢查Veeva Systems的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素要考慮。

big
NYSE:VEEV Earnings and Revenue Growth November 28th 2024
紐交所:veeva systems 2024年11月28日的收益和營收增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Veeva Systems. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.9% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.0% by the third-largest shareholder. Peter Gassner, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股份,董事會很可能需要關注他們的偏好。我們注意到對於veeva systems,對沖基金沒有意義的投資。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是該公司最大的股東,持有8.9%的流通股。第二大股東持有約7.6%的流通股,緊隨其後的是第三大股東持有6.0%的股份。第二大股東Peter Gassner還兼任首席執行官。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 19 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步調查,我們發現前19名股東在公司中擁有51%的綜合所有權,這表明沒有任何單一股東對公司具有重大控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Veeva Systems

Veeva Systems的內部股權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Veeva Systems Inc.. Insiders own US$3.0b worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以看到內部持有Veeva Systems Inc.的股份。 內部持有的股份價值30億美元(按當前價格計算)。 大多數人會說這表明股東和董事會之間利益一致。 但還是值得檢查一下那些內部人士是否一直在賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,包括零售投資者,擁有公司的10%股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以在其方面左右政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Veeva Systems better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Veeva Systems that you should be aware of.

考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解veeva systems,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經發現veeva systems有1個警示標誌,你應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論