Here's Why TPV Technology (SZSE:000727) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly
Here's Why TPV Technology (SZSE:000727) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that TPV Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:000727) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
禾倫·巴菲特曾說:『波動性遠非與風險同義。』 在審視一家公司風險時,自然會考慮其資產負債表,因爲當業務崩潰時,債務通常是其中的因素。我們可以看到,冠捷科技有限公司(SZSE:000727)確實在其業務中使用債務。但股東應該擔心其債務使用嗎?
When Is Debt A Problem?
什麼時候負債才是一個問題?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
債務在業務還清前都能爲其提供支持,直到業務出現困境,通過新資本或自由現金流來還清。 最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能什麼也得不到。 然而,更常見(但仍然痛苦)的情況是它必須以低價籌集新股權資本,從而永久稀釋股東的權益。 相反,如果替代稀釋,債務可以成爲需要資本投資以高回報率實現增長的業務的極好工具。 考慮業務使用多少債務時,首先要做的是將其現金和債務放在一起查看。
What Is TPV Technology's Net Debt?
冠捷科技的淨債務是什麼?
As you can see below, TPV Technology had CN¥4.26b of debt, at September 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. On the flip side, it has CN¥4.03b in cash leading to net debt of about CN¥236.8m.
正如您在下方看到的,冠捷科技在2024年9月的債務爲42.6億人民幣,與前年大致相同。您可以點擊圖表以獲取更多詳細信息。另一方面,它擁有40.3億人民幣的現金,導致淨債務約爲23680萬人民幣。

How Healthy Is TPV Technology's Balance Sheet?
冠捷科技的資產負債表有多健康?
The latest balance sheet data shows that TPV Technology had liabilities of CN¥25.8b due within a year, and liabilities of CN¥1.07b falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of CN¥4.03b as well as receivables valued at CN¥10.8b due within 12 months. So its liabilities total CN¥12.1b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
最新的資產負債表數據顯示,冠捷科技在一年內有負債258億人民幣,並且在之後到期的負債爲10.7億人民幣。爲了抵消這些義務,它有現金40.3億人民幣以及價值108億人民幣的應收賬款將在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債總計比現金和短期應收賬款的組合多出121億人民幣。
This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of CN¥13.4b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on TPV Technology's use of debt. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.
這一赤字相對於其市值134億人民幣來說相當可觀,因此確實暗示股東應該關注冠捷科技的債務使用。如果其貸款方要求它加強資產負債表,股東可能會面臨嚴重的稀釋。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
爲了衡量公司債務相對於其收入的規模,我們計算其淨債務除以利息、稅收、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),並計算其利息前稅利潤(EBIT)除以利息支出(其利息覆蓋率)。這樣,我們考慮了債務的絕對金額,以及支付的利率。
TPV Technology has net debt of just 0.10 times EBITDA, indicating that it is certainly not a reckless borrower. And it boasts interest cover of 8.2 times, which is more than adequate. But the bad news is that TPV Technology has seen its EBIT plunge 10% in the last twelve months. We think hat kind of performance, if repeated frequently, could well lead to difficulties for the stock. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since TPV Technology will need earnings to service that debt. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.
冠捷科技的淨債務僅爲EBITDA的0.10倍,這表明它絕對不是一個魯莽的借款者。而且它的利息覆蓋率爲8.2倍,遠遠足夠。但壞消息是,冠捷科技的EBIT在過去十二個月內驟降了10%。我們認爲這種表現如果頻繁出現,可能會導致股票出現困難。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是一個合理的起點。但你不能完全孤立地看待債務;因爲冠捷科技需要收益來償還這些債務。因此,如果你想更多地了解它的收益,可以查看這張它長期收益趨勢的圖表。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the last three years, TPV Technology actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. That sort of strong cash generation warms our hearts like a puppy in a bumblebee suit.
但我們最後的考量也很重要,因爲公司無法用紙面利潤來償還債務;它需要實際的現金流。因此,合乎邏輯的一步是查看EBIT的比例與實際自由現金流的匹配情況。在過去三年中,冠捷科技實際上產生的自由現金流超過了EBIT。這種強勁的現金生成讓我們感到溫暖,就像小狗穿着大黃蜂的衣服。
Our View
我們的觀點
Both TPV Technology's ability to to convert EBIT to free cash flow and its net debt to EBITDA gave us comfort that it can handle its debt. Having said that, its EBIT growth rate somewhat sensitizes us to potential future risks to the balance sheet. Looking at all this data makes us feel a little cautious about TPV Technology's debt levels. While we appreciate debt can enhance returns on equity, we'd suggest that shareholders keep close watch on its debt levels, lest they increase. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with TPV Technology .
無論是冠捷科技將EBIT轉換爲自由現金流的能力,還是其淨債務與EBITDA的比率,都讓我們對其能夠處理債務感到放心。儘管如此,其EBIT增長率讓我們對未來資產負債表的潛在風險感到敏感。看着所有這些數據,讓我們對冠捷科技的債務水平感到有些謹慎。雖然我們讚賞債務可以提升股本回報,但我們建議股東密切關注其債務水平,以免它們增加。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是重點關注的領域。然而,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。爲此,您應該意識到我們發現的冠捷科技的一個警告信號。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
每天結束時,通常更好地關注那些沒有淨債務的公司。您可以查看我們特別名單上的這些公司(所有這些公司都有盈利增長記錄)。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。