share_log

We Think You Can Look Beyond Vestis' (NYSE:VSTS) Lackluster Earnings

We Think You Can Look Beyond Vestis' (NYSE:VSTS) Lackluster Earnings

我們認爲您可以看到Vestis(紐交所:VSTS)乏善可陳的收入
Simply Wall St ·  18:45

Vestis Corporation's (NYSE:VSTS) stock was strong despite it releasing a soft earnings report last week. We think that investors might be looking at some positive factors beyond the earnings numbers.

儘管上週發佈了疲軟的收益報告,但Vestis公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:VSTS)的股票表現強勁。我們認爲,除了收益數字外,投資者可能會考慮一些積極因素。

big
NYSE:VSTS Earnings and Revenue History November 29th 2024
紐約證券交易所:VSTS 收益和收入歷史記錄 2024 年 11 月 29 日

A Closer Look At Vestis' Earnings

仔細研究Vestis的收益

Many investors haven't heard of the accrual ratio from cashflow, but it is actually a useful measure of how well a company's profit is backed up by free cash flow (FCF) during a given period. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'.

許多投資者尚未聽說過現金流的應計比率,但它實際上是衡量公司在給定時期內自由現金流(FCF)在多大程度上支持利潤的有用指標。爲了獲得應計比率,我們首先從一段時期的利潤中減去FCF,然後將該數字除以該期間的平均運營資產。你可以將現金流的應計比率視爲 「非FCF利潤率」。

That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

這意味着負應計比率是一件好事,因爲它表明該公司帶來的自由現金流比其利潤所暗示的要多。這並不意味着我們應該擔心應計比率爲正,但值得注意的是,應計比率相當高的地方。值得注意的是,有一些學術證據表明,總的來說,高應計率對短期利潤來說是個壞兆頭。

Vestis has an accrual ratio of -0.17 for the year to September 2024. Therefore, its statutory earnings were very significantly less than its free cashflow. To wit, it produced free cash flow of US$393m during the period, dwarfing its reported profit of US$21.0m. Vestis' free cash flow improved over the last year, which is generally good to see.

截至2024年9月的一年中,Vestis的應計比率爲-0.17。因此,其法定收入大大低於其自由現金流。換句話說,它在此期間產生了3.93億美元的自由現金流,使其報告的210萬美元利潤相形見絀。Vestis的自由現金流比去年有所改善,總體而言,這是值得期待的。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓你想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以點擊此處查看根據他們的估計描繪未來盈利能力的交互式圖表。

Our Take On Vestis' Profit Performance

我們對Vestis盈利表現的看法

As we discussed above, Vestis' accrual ratio indicates strong conversion of profit to free cash flow, which is a positive for the company. Based on this observation, we consider it possible that Vestis' statutory profit actually understates its earnings potential! Unfortunately, though, its earnings per share actually fell back over the last year. The goal of this article has been to assess how well we can rely on the statutory earnings to reflect the company's potential, but there is plenty more to consider. Keep in mind, when it comes to analysing a stock it's worth noting the risks involved. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Vestis (1 is concerning) you should be familiar with.

正如我們上面討論的那樣,Vestis的應計比率表明利潤向自由現金流的強勁轉換,這對公司來說是一個積極因素。基於這一觀察,我們認爲Vestis的法定利潤實際上可能低估了其盈利潛力!但不幸的是,其每股收益實際上在去年有所回落。本文的目標是評估我們在多大程度上可以依靠法定收益來反映公司的潛力,但還有很多需要考慮的地方。請記住,在分析股票時,值得注意所涉及的風險。例如,我們已經確定了你應該熟悉的兩個Vestis警告信號(其中一個令人擔憂)。

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Vestis' profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.

這份報告只研究了揭示Vestis利潤性質的單一因素。但是,如果你能夠將注意力集中在細節上,總會有更多的事情需要發現。有些人認爲高股本回報率是優質業務的好兆頭。因此,你可能希望看到這份擁有高股本回報率的公司的免費集合,或者這份內部所有權高的股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論