The Travelers Companies, Inc. (NYSE:TRV) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 84% of the Company
The Travelers Companies, Inc. (NYSE:TRV) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 84% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Travelers Companies implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 15 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 機構在Travelers Companies的大量持股意味着他們對該公司的股價具有重大影響力。
- 共有15名投資者擁有該公司的多數股份,擁有50%的所有權。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
Every investor in The Travelers Companies, Inc. (NYSE:TRV) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 84% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
凡是投資紐約旅行者保險公司(NYSE:TRV)的投資者都應該注意最強大的股東群體。持有公司最多股份的群體,準確地說約佔84%的股份,是機構。換句話說,這個群體將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或者承擔最多)風險。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Travelers Companies.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了旅行者保險公司的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Travelers Companies?
機構持股數量告訴我們關於Travelers Companies的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Travelers Companies. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Travelers Companies' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在旅行者保險公司擁有相當大比例的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲有時機構也會犯錯誤投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的觀點,您可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得看看旅行者保險公司下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Travelers Companies is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.5% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.5% and 6.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此他們很可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。Travelers Companies不是對沖基金所擁有。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大的股東,持有公司9.5%的股份。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有公司8.5%和6.9%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 15 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東名冊上可以看出,50%的所有權由前15名股東控制,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有大多數的所有權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Travelers Companies
Travelers Companies的內部股權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of The Travelers Companies, Inc. in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$223m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的數據顯示,內部人員以自己的名義持有了少於1%的Travelers Companies, Inc.。由於這是一家大公司,我們只希望內部人士持有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他們持有價值22300萬美元的股份。看到董事會成員持有股份是件好事,但值得注意的是,可能值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在購買。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in Travelers Companies. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有Travelers Companies的16%股份。雖然這種所有權規模可能還不足以左右政策決定,但他們仍然可能對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Travelers Companies , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
在考慮擁有公司的不同群體時很值得,但有其他更重要的因素。例如,要考慮投資風險這個始終存在的魅影。我們已經確定了1個關於Travelers Companies的警告信號,理解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。