Retail Investors Among Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd.'s (HKG:2869) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 4.9% Last Week
Retail Investors Among Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd.'s (HKG:2869) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 4.9% Last Week
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Greentown Service Group's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Insiders own 16% of Greentown Service Group
- 綠城服務集團擁有大量散戶投資者的所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
- 共有3位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲52%
- 內部人士擁有綠城服務集團16%的股份
If you want to know who really controls Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKG:2869), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 34% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制了綠城服務集團有限公司有限公司(HKG: 2869),那麼你得看看它的股份登記處的構成。散戶投資者持有該公司的最大股份,佔有34%的股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
As a result, retail investors were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 4.9% gain.
因此,散戶投資者是上週4.9%漲幅的最大受益者。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Greentown Service Group.
在下圖中,我們放大了綠城服務集團的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Greentown Service Group?
關於綠城服務集團,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。
Greentown Service Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Greentown Service Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
綠城服務集團已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看綠城服務集團過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
It would appear that 5.2% of Greentown Service Group shares are controlled by hedge funds. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. The company's largest shareholder is Orchid Garden Investment Company Limited, with ownership of 32%. With 14% and 5.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Hairong Li and Yiheng Capital Management, L.P. are the second and third largest shareholders.
綠城服務集團5.2%的股票似乎由對沖基金控制。這引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者帶來能夠爲股東創造短期價值的變革。該公司的最大股東是胡姬花園投資有限公司,所有權爲32%。李海榮和易恒資本管理有限責任公司分別擁有14%和5.2%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現前三名股東共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着他們擁有影響公司決策的巨大權力。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Greentown Service Group
綠城服務集團的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful HK$2.0b stake in this HK$12b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
內部人士似乎擁有綠城服務集團公司的很大一部分股份。有限公司。有趣的是,內部人士在這項120億港元的業務中擁有20億港元的大量股份。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 34% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Greentown Service Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
綠城服務集團擁有34%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對綠城服務集團有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 32%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的32%。僅從這一事實中很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究一下誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過獨立的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Greentown Service Group that you should be aware of before investing here.
儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現了綠城服務集團的一個警告信號,在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。