share_log

SM Energy (NYSE:SM) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

SM Energy (NYSE:SM) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

sm energy(紐交所:SM)似乎相當明智地使用債務
Simply Wall St ·  11/30 09:22

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, SM Energy Company (NYSE:SM) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

有人認爲,作爲投資者,最好的風險思考方式是波動性,而不是債務,但禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:'波動性遠非風險的代名詞。'所以聰明的投資者知道,債務(通常涉及破產)是評估公司風險程度時一個非常重要的因素。重要的是,sm energy公司(紐交所:sm)確實有債務。但更重要的問題是:這些債務造成了多大風險?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

當公司無法通過自由現金流或以有吸引力的價格籌集資金來輕鬆履行債務或其他負債時,債務和其他負債對業務構成風險。 如果情況變得非常糟糕,債權人可以接管公司。 然而,更頻繁(但仍然昂貴)的情況是公司必須以低價發行股票,永久稀釋股東的權益,以穩固其資產負債表。 當然,許多公司借債以實現增長,沒有任何負面後果。 當我們考慮一家公司的債務使用情況時,我們首先看現金和債務的總體情況。

What Is SM Energy's Debt?

Sm Energy的債務情況如何?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 SM Energy had US$2.71b of debt, an increase on US$1.57b, over one year. However, it does have US$1.74b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$971.4m.

您可以點擊下方的圖表查看歷史數字,但從2024年9月的數據來看,Sm Energy的債務爲27.1億美元,較一年前的15.7億美元有所增加。然而,它持有17.4億美元的現金用來抵消這些債務,導致淨債務約爲97140萬美元。

big
NYSE:SM Debt to Equity History November 30th 2024
紐交所:Sm 債務股權歷史記錄於2024年11月30日

A Look At SM Energy's Liabilities

查看 sm energy 的負債情況

According to the last reported balance sheet, SM Energy had liabilities of US$581.1m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$3.39b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$1.74b in cash and US$226.6m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$2.00b.

根據最近的資產負債表顯示,sm energy 有58110萬美元的負債需要在12個月內償還,以及33.9億美元的負債需要超過12個月償還。與此相抵消的是,它有17.4億美元的現金和22660萬美元的應收賬款需要在12個月內償還。所以其負債超過了其現金和(短期)應收賬款的總和20億美元。

This deficit isn't so bad because SM Energy is worth US$5.17b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

這個赤字並不那麼糟糕,因爲sm energy 的價值爲51.7億美元,因此如果有需要,可能可以籌集足夠的資本來鞏固其資產負債表。但顯然,我們應該密切關注它是否能夠在不稀釋的情況下管理債務。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。

SM Energy's net debt is only 0.53 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 13.5 times the size. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. The good news is that SM Energy has increased its EBIT by 7.7% over twelve months, which should ease any concerns about debt repayment. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine SM Energy's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

sm energy 的淨債務僅爲其 EBITDA 的0.53倍。而且其稅前利潤輕鬆覆蓋了利息支出,是其13.5倍大小。所以你可以認爲它對債務的威脅並不比大象受到老鼠威脅更多。好消息是,sm energy 在過去十二個月內將其稅前利潤增加了7.7%,這應該緩解關於債務償還的任何擔憂。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。而決定 sm energy 能否保持健康資產負債表的更多是未來收入。因此,如果你專注於未來,可以查看這份包含分析師利潤預測的免費報告。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. In the last three years, SM Energy's free cash flow amounted to 48% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最後,一個業務需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤是不夠的。所以邏輯的下一步是查看稅前利潤中實際自由現金流的比例。在過去三年中,sm energy 的自由現金流佔其稅前利潤的48%,低於我們的預期。在償還債務方面,並不理想。

Our View

我們的觀點

Happily, SM Energy's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its net debt to EBITDA also supports that impression! Looking at all the aforementioned factors together, it strikes us that SM Energy can handle its debt fairly comfortably. Of course, while this leverage can enhance returns on equity, it does bring more risk, so it's worth keeping an eye on this one. We'd be motivated to research the stock further if we found out that SM Energy insiders have bought shares recently. If you would too, then you're in luck, since today we're sharing our list of reported insider transactions for free.

快樂的是,Sm Energy的令人印象深刻的利息支付能力表明它在債務方面佔據上風。而好消息還不止於此,因爲其淨債務與EBITDA比例也支持這種印象!綜合考慮所有前述因素,我們認爲Sm Energy可以相當舒適地處理其債務。當然,雖然這種槓桿可以增加股本回報,但也會帶來更多風險,因此值得繼續關注。如果發現Sm Energy的內部人員最近購買了股票,我們會被激勵繼續研究這支股票。如果您也是,那麼您很幸運,因爲今天我們將免費分享我們的報告內部交易名單。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論