Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as Hubei Xiangyuan New Material Technology Inc. (SZSE:300980) Touches CN¥3.1b Market Cap
Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as Hubei Xiangyuan New Material Technology Inc. (SZSE:300980) Touches CN¥3.1b Market Cap
Key Insights
主要見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Hubei Xiangyuan New Material Technology's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- The top 5 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Institutions own 11% of Hubei Xiangyuan New Material Technology
- 內部人士似乎對湖北香源新材料科技的發展有既得利益,因爲他們持有大量股份。
- 該公司的前五大股東擁有51%的股份。
- 機構持有湖北香源新材料科技11%的股份。
If you want to know who really controls Hubei Xiangyuan New Material Technology Inc. (SZSE:300980), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 43% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制了湖北香源新材料科技有限公司(深證:300980),那麼你需要查看其股權登記情況。我們可以看到,個人內部人士在公司中擁有43%的股份,換句話說,這個集團從他們對公司的投資中獲得的收益最大(或損失最大)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥417m last week.
顯然,上週該公司的市值上漲了41700萬人民幣後,內部人員受益最多。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Hubei Xiangyuan New Material Technology.
在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於湖北向原新材料科技的不同股權組。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hubei Xiangyuan New Material Technology?
機構持股對湖北向原新材料科技有何啓示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hubei Xiangyuan New Material Technology. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Hubei Xiangyuan New Material Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所見,機構投資者在湖北向原新材料科技中擁有相當一部分股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。但是,最好對依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證保持謹慎。他們有時也會判斷失誤。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,始終存在他們參與的'擁擠交易'的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多個方可能會迅速競爭拋售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到湖北向原新材料科技的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,這背後總還有更多的故事。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hubei Xiangyuan New Material Technology. Zhixiang Wei is currently the largest shareholder, with 26% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 17% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.5% by the third-largest shareholder. Qiong Wei, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
對沖基金在湖北湘源新材料科技的股份不多。 目前,魏志翔是最大股東,持有26%的流通股份。 對於背景,第二大股東持有約17%的流通股份,第三大股東則擁有3.5%的股份。 而第二大股東魏瓊恰好擔任首席執行官。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前5位股東控制了該公司超過一半的股份,這意味着該組人對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
儘管有必要研究公司的機構持股數據,但研究分析師的情緒也是有道理的,以了解風向。這隻股票有一些分析師的覆蓋,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵蓋面的空間。
Insider Ownership Of Hubei Xiangyuan New Material Technology
湖北湘源新材料科技的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Hubei Xiangyuan New Material Technology Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥3.1b, and insiders have CN¥1.4b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起來內部人士持有湖北香源新材料科技股份有限公司相當大比例的股份。它的市值僅爲31億人民幣,內部人士名下持有價值14億人民幣的股票。看到內部人士如此投資於業務真是太好了。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否有買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 42% stake in Hubei Xiangyuan New Material Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆一般是個人投資者,他們在湖北香源新材料科技中持有42%的股份。儘管這個持股比例相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,這可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 3.1%, of the Hubei Xiangyuan New Material Technology stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
似乎湖北湘遠新材料科技的股票有3.1%的股份屬於私營公司。私營公司可能是相關方。有時,內部人員通過持有私營公司的股份而不是以個人身份擁有對上市公司的利益。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但這值得作爲一個進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hubei Xiangyuan New Material Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Hubei Xiangyuan New Material Technology you should be aware of.
考慮擁有公司股份的不同團體總是值得的。但要更好地理解湖北湘遠新材料科技,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例子:我們發現了湖北湘遠新材料科技的4個警示信號,你應該注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。