share_log

Owning 67% in Anker Innovations Limited (SZSE:300866) Means That Insiders Are Heavily Invested in the Company's Future

Owning 67% in Anker Innovations Limited (SZSE:300866) Means That Insiders Are Heavily Invested in the Company's Future

擁有安克創新有限公司 (SZSE:300866) 67%的股份意味着內部人員對公司的未來有很大的投資。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/01 10:49

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over Anker Innovations implies vested interests in company growth
  • 56% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Institutional ownership in Anker Innovations is 14%
  • 安克創新公司內部人對公司增長的控制權意味着利益關係
  • 公司前2名股東持有56%的股份
  • 安克創新公司的機構持股比例爲14%

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Anker Innovations Limited (SZSE:300866), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 67% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解真正控制安克創新有限公司(SZSE:300866)的人是誰,重要的是了解公司的所有權結構。持有最大股份的是持股67%的個人內部人士。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

So, insiders of Anker Innovations have a lot at stake and every decision they make on the company's future is important to them from a financial point of view.

因此,安克創新的內部人士面臨着很大的風險,他們在公司未來的每一個決定在財務上對他們來說都至關重要。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Anker Innovations, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討一下安克創新每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
SZSE:300866 Ownership Breakdown December 1st 2024
SZSE:300866 2024年12月1日的股權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Anker Innovations?

機構投資者對安克創新的持股告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Anker Innovations does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Anker Innovations' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到安克創新確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的相當大部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好警惕依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們有時也會犯錯。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,存在它們參與的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更大。您可以查看安克創新的歷史收益和營業收入,但請謹記故事總是更多。

big
SZSE:300866 Earnings and Revenue Growth December 1st 2024
SZSE:300866在2024年12月1日的收益和營業收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Anker Innovations. Meng Yang is currently the largest shareholder, with 44% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.2% by the third-largest shareholder. Dongping Zhao, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of President.

我們注意到,對於Anker Innovations,對沖基金並沒有進行有意義的投資。孟洋目前是最大的股東,持有44%的股份。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約12%的股份,第三大股東持有4.2%的股份。同時,作爲第二大股東的趙東平也擔任總裁職務。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 56% stake.

股東登記簿的更詳細研究顯示,前兩大股東佔有該公司56%的股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Anker Innovations

Anker Innovations的內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Anker Innovations Limited. This gives them effective control of the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥44b, that means insiders have a whopping CN¥29b worth of shares in their own names. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to discover if they have been buying or selling.

根據我們的信息顯示,內部人士擁有安克創新有限公司超過一半的股份。這使他們有效控制着公司。鑑於其市值爲人民幣440億,這意味着內部人士擁有價值高達人民幣290億的股份。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望了解他們是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Anker Innovations. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆(通常是個人投資者)持有安克創新公司17%的股份。雖然這個群體可能不能說了算,但他們確實能對公司的運營產生實質影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Anker Innovations that you should be aware of before investing here.

儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們發現了關於Anker Innovations的一個警告信號,在你在這裏投資之前應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論