Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. As with many other companies Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
一些人說,波動性而不是債務是投資者思考風險的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾著名地說:『波動性遠非風險的同義詞。』 當你考察一家公司的風險時,自然要考慮該公司的資產負債表,因爲當業務崩潰時,債務往往是涉及的因素。 就像許多其他公司一樣,洛克希德馬丁公司(紐交所:LMT)也利用債務。 但更重要的問題是:這些債務帶來了多大的風險?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時有危險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
當企業不能輕鬆運用自由現金流或者以合適的價格籌資時,債務和其他負債便會導致風險。在最壞的情況下,公司如果無法償付其債權人債務,則可能會破產。而即使不至於破產,我們通常也會看到負債累累的企業因爲受到貸款人的壓力而永久稀釋股東權益,因爲它們被迫以低於市值的價格籌集資金。而債務則可以通過替代股權稀釋而成爲需要以高回報率投資爲增長的企業的一種非常好的工具。考慮到企業使用了多少債務時,首先要做的就是查看其現金和債務情況。
What Is Lockheed Martin's Net Debt?
洛克希德馬丁的淨債務是多少?
As you can see below, at the end of September 2024, Lockheed Martin had US$19.3b of debt, up from US$17.4b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it also had US$3.15b in cash, and so its net debt is US$16.2b.
正如下方所示,截至2024年9月,洛克希德馬丁的債務爲193億美金,較一年前的174億美金有所增加。點擊圖片了解更多細節。 然而,它也有31.5億美金的現金,因此其淨債務爲162億美金。
How Strong Is Lockheed Martin's Balance Sheet?
洛克希德馬丁的資產負債表有多強?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Lockheed Martin had liabilities of US$17.8b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$30.5b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$3.15b in cash and US$16.4b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$28.8b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
我們可以從最近的資產負債表中看到,洛克希德馬丁在一年內到期的負債爲178億美元,而到期在一年之後的負債爲305億美元。爲了抵消這個負債,它擁有31.5億美元的現金和164億美元的應收款,都是在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債總額比現金和短期應收款加起來多出288億美元。
This deficit isn't so bad because Lockheed Martin is worth a massive US$125.5b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.
這個赤字並不算太嚴重,因爲洛克希德馬丁的市值高達1255億美元,因此如果需要的話,可能能夠籌集足夠的資本來鞏固其資產負債表。然而,仔細看看它償還債務的能力仍然是值得的。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
通過查看公司的淨債務與利息、稅、折舊、攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)之比以及它的利息費用(利息覆蓋率)可以衡量一個公司的債務負擔與收益能力。因此,我們考慮將債務與有無計算折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對比。
With a debt to EBITDA ratio of 1.6, Lockheed Martin uses debt artfully but responsibly. And the fact that its trailing twelve months of EBIT was 8.7 times its interest expenses harmonizes with that theme. Lockheed Martin's EBIT was pretty flat over the last year, but that shouldn't be an issue given the it doesn't have a lot of debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Lockheed Martin's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
洛克希德馬丁的負債與EBITDA的比率爲1.6,巧妙而負責任地使用債務。而其過去12個月的EBIT是利息支出的8.7倍,這與這一主題相符。洛克希德馬丁的EBIT在過去一年中基本持平,但考慮到它的債務不多,這不應該是個問題。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是一個明顯的起點。但未來的收益,遠比其他任何因素,更能判斷洛克希德馬丁在未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的看法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, Lockheed Martin generated free cash flow amounting to a very robust 82% of its EBIT, more than we'd expect. That positions it well to pay down debt if desirable to do so.
最後,業務需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤是不可行的。因此,我們總是檢查EBIT中有多少轉換爲自由現金流。在過去三年中,洛克希德馬丁產生的自由現金流達到了其EBIT的82%,這一比例遠超我們的預期。這使其在需要償還債務時處於良好位置。
Our View
我們的觀點
Happily, Lockheed Martin's impressive conversion of EBIT to free cash flow implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And that's just the beginning of the good news since its interest cover is also very heartening. All these things considered, it appears that Lockheed Martin can comfortably handle its current debt levels. On the plus side, this leverage can boost shareholder returns, but the potential downside is more risk of loss, so it's worth monitoring the balance sheet. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Lockheed Martin that you should be aware of before investing here.
欣喜的是,洛克希德馬丁將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流的能力令人印象深刻,這意味着它在債務上佔據優勢。而這僅僅是好消息的開始,因爲它的利息涵蓋率也非常令人鼓舞。考慮到所有這些,洛克希德馬丁似乎能夠輕鬆應對當前的債務水平。積極的一面是,這種槓桿可以提升股東回報,但潛在的 downside 是損失風險更高,因此值得監控資產負債表。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是一個好的起點。但最終,每家公司都可能存在資產負債表之外的風險。例如,我們發現了一個你在此投資前需要了解的洛克希德馬丁的警示信號。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
每天結束時,通常更好地關注那些沒有淨債務的公司。您可以查看我們特別名單上的這些公司(所有這些公司都有盈利增長記錄)。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。