Here's Why SemiLEDs (NASDAQ:LEDS) Can Afford Some Debt
Here's Why SemiLEDs (NASDAQ:LEDS) Can Afford Some Debt
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, SemiLEDs Corporation (NASDAQ:LEDS) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
有人說,波動性,而不是債務,是投資者思考風險的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾說過一句名言:「波動性遠非風險的代名詞。」當我們考慮一家公司的風險時,我們總是喜歡考慮其債務的用途,因爲債務過載可能導致破產。重要的是,SemiLEDS公司(納斯達克股票代碼:LEDS)確實有債務。但更重要的問題是:這筆債務會帶來多大的風險?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
爲什麼債務會帶來風險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
當企業無法通過自由現金流或以誘人的價格籌集資金來輕鬆履行這些義務時,債務和其他負債就會成爲風險。最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東們可能會一無所獲。但是,更頻繁(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司必須以低廉的價格發行股票,永久稀釋股東,以支撐其資產負債表。話雖如此,最常見的情況是公司合理地管理債務,而且對自己有利。當我們檢查債務水平時,我們首先要同時考慮現金和債務水平。
How Much Debt Does SemiLEDs Carry?
SemiLED 揹負了多少債務?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that SemiLEDs had US$3.72m of debt in August 2024, down from US$6.37m, one year before. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$1.67m, its net debt is less, at about US$2.05m.
你可以點擊下圖查看歷史數字,但它顯示SemiLEDS在2024年8月有372萬美元的債務,低於一年前的637萬美元。但是,由於其現金儲備爲167萬美元,其淨負債較少,約爲205萬美元。
How Strong Is SemiLEDs' Balance Sheet?
SemiLEDS 的資產負債表有多強?
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that SemiLEDs had liabilities of US$7.02m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$1.87m due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$1.67m in cash and US$416.0k in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$6.80m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
放大最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到,SemiLEDS在12個月內到期的負債爲702萬美元,之後到期的負債爲187萬美元。與此相抵消的是,它有167萬美元的現金和416.0萬美元的應收賬款將在12個月內到期。因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和高出680萬美元。
This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of US$9.30m. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is SemiLEDs's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.
相對於其930萬美元的市值,這是一座巨大的槓桿率。如果其貸款人要求其支撐資產負債表,股東可能會面臨嚴重的稀釋。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到的關於債務的知識最多。但是,影響未來資產負債表狀況的是SemiLEDS的收益。因此,如果你想進一步了解其收益,可能值得看看這張長期收益趨勢圖。
In the last year SemiLEDs had a loss before interest and tax, and actually shrunk its revenue by 13%, to US$5.2m. That's not what we would hope to see.
去年,SemiLEDS在利息和稅前出現虧損,實際上其收入減少了13%,至520萬美元。這不是我們希望看到的。
Caveat Emptor
Caveat Emptor
Not only did SemiLEDs's revenue slip over the last twelve months, but it also produced negative earnings before interest and tax (EBIT). Indeed, it lost a very considerable US$3.0m at the EBIT level. When we look at that and recall the liabilities on its balance sheet, relative to cash, it seems unwise to us for the company to have any debt. Quite frankly we think the balance sheet is far from match-fit, although it could be improved with time. However, it doesn't help that it burned through US$517k of cash over the last year. So in short it's a really risky stock. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for SemiLEDs (2 are significant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
在過去的十二個月中,SemiLEDS的收入不僅下滑,而且還產生了負的利息和稅前收益(EBIT)。事實上,在息稅前利潤水平上,它損失了相當可觀的300萬美元。當我們審視這一點並回顧其資產負債表上相對於現金的負債時,對我們來說,公司有任何債務似乎是不明智的。坦率地說,我們認爲資產負債表遠非匹配,儘管可以隨着時間的推移而改善。但是,去年它消耗了51.7萬美元的現金,這無濟於事。因此,簡而言之,這是一隻非常有風險的股票。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但歸根結底,每家公司都可以控制資產負債表之外存在的風險。例如,我們發現了 SemiLED 的 4 個警告信號(2 個很重要!)在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。
If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.
畢竟,如果你對一家資產負債表堅如磐石的快速成長型公司更感興趣,那麼請立即查看我們的淨現金增長股票清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。