Chengdu Haoneng Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603809) Adds CN¥395m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 45% Stake in That Gain
Chengdu Haoneng Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603809) Adds CN¥395m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 45% Stake in That Gain
Key Insights
主要見解
- Chengdu Haoneng Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- 52% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders
- 14% of Chengdu Haoneng Technology is held by Institutions
- 豪能股份重大內部持股顯示對公司擴張的固有興趣
- 前十大股東持有該業務的52%。
- 機構持有豪能股份14%
If you want to know who really controls Chengdu Haoneng Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603809), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 45% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制豪能股份有限公司(SHSE:603809),那麼你必須看看其股權登記簿的構成。持有該公司股份最多的集團,準確地說約佔公司股份的45%,是個體內部投資者。換句話說,該集團將從其對該公司的投資中獲得最多利潤(或損失最多)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥395m last week.
顯然,在上週公司市值上升39500萬人民幣後,內部人員受益最多。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Chengdu Haoneng Technology, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究一下豪能股份的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chengdu Haoneng Technology?
機構持股告訴我們有關豪能股份的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
Chengdu Haoneng Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Chengdu Haoneng Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
豪能股份已經有機構在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經研究過這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者嘗試同時拋售一支股票,很常見看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查一下豪能股份的過去收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Chengdu Haoneng Technology. Chao Dong Xiang is currently the company's largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. Ying Chao Xu is the second largest shareholder owning 6.6% of common stock, and Xing Xing Xiang holds about 6.5% of the company stock. In addition, we found that Yong Zhang, the CEO has 2.8% of the shares allocated to their name.
我們注意到,對豪能股份沒有任何重要的對沖基金投資。 Chao Dong Xiang目前是公司最大的股東,持有17%的股份。 英超旭持有第二多的股份,佔已發行股票的6.6%,而星星祥持有公司股份的約6.5%。此外,我們發現CEO張勇名下擁有2.8%的股份。
We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進行了更深入的調查發現,前10名股東持有的股份約佔登記的52%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師情緒來了解風向也是有意義的。雖然有些股票受到分析師的關注,但該公司可能並未受到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在路上獲得更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Chengdu Haoneng Technology
豪能股份的內部人員所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Chengdu Haoneng Technology Co., Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥3.3b stake in this CN¥7.3b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
最近的數據顯示,內部持有合理比例的豪能股份。看到內部人士在這家市值73億人民幣的公司持有33億人民幣的股份非常有趣。大多數人會說,這表明在這樣規模的公司中,內部人士與股東有很好的一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人員是買入還是賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 40% stake in Chengdu Haoneng Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通投資大衆,通常是個人投資者,持有豪能股份40%的股份。儘管擁有相當比例的持股,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Chengdu Haoneng Technology you should know about.
我發現查看公司的股東非常有趣。 但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如要考慮風險。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現了豪能股份的3個警示信號,您應該了解。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。