Petpal Pet Nutrition Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300673) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Zhen Biao Chen, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 11% Last Week
Petpal Pet Nutrition Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300673) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Zhen Biao Chen, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 11% Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Petpal Pet Nutrition Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- The top 3 shareholders own 52% of the company
- Institutional ownership in Petpal Pet Nutrition Technology is 11%
- 佩蒂股份的顯著內部持股表明對公司擴展的內在利益
- 前三大股東擁有公司的52%。
- 佩蒂股份的機構持股爲11%
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Petpal Pet Nutrition Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300673), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 52% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制着佩蒂股份有限公司(SZSE:300673),重要的是要理解該業務的所有權結構。持有最大份額的群體是擁有52%股權的內部人員。換句話說,這個群體在他們對公司的投資中最有可能獲利(或承受最大損失)。
As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 11% gain.
因此,內部人士是上週11%漲幅的最大受益者。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Petpal Pet Nutrition Technology.
讓我們更深入地了解一下不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於佩蒂股份的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Petpal Pet Nutrition Technology?
機構持股告訴我們關於佩蒂股份什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Petpal Pet Nutrition Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Petpal Pet Nutrition Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
佩蒂股份的股東名冊上已經有機構了。確實,他們在公司的股份比例相當可觀。這可能表明該公司在投資界具備一定的可信度。然而,最好還是對依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證保持警惕。他們有時也會出錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖撤出某隻股票,大幅股價下跌並不罕見。因此,查看佩蒂股份過去的盈利趨勢是值得的(如下所示)。當然,也要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Petpal Pet Nutrition Technology. The company's CEO Zhen Biao Chen is the largest shareholder with 38% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 3.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Xiang Lan Zheng is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
我們注意到對佩蒂股份的對沖基金沒有進行有意義的投資。公司的首席執行官陳振標是最大股東,持有38%的流通股。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有11%和3.3%的流通股。有趣的是,第三大股東鄭湘嵐也是董事會成員,這再次表明公司頂級股東中有很強的內部持股。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 52% stake.
股東登記簿的更爲詳細的研究顯示,前三大股東持有該公司的52%股權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Petpal Pet Nutrition Technology
佩蒂股份的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Petpal Pet Nutrition Technology Co., Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥4.0b, that means they have CN¥2.1b worth of shares. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有佩蒂股份有限公司的多數股權。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決策。鑑於其市值爲人民幣40億,這意味着他們持有價值人民幣21億的股份。看到這種投資水平很不錯。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士是否最近有買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 36% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司36%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這個群體不能決定公司的決策,但它確實可以對公司的經營方式產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。