share_log

Albert Lowenthal Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.'s (NYSE:OPY) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 8.0%last Week

Albert Lowenthal Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.'s (NYSE:OPY) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 8.0%last Week

奧本海默控股公司(NYSE:OPY)的首席執行官是最看好的內部人士,他們的股票價值上週上漲了8.0%
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/03 21:30

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Oppenheimer Holdings' growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Institutional ownership in Oppenheimer Holdings is 36%
  • 內部人員似乎對奧本海默控股的增長有着強烈的利益,這可以從他們持有的大量股份中看出
  • 共有4個投資者掌握51%的所有權。
  • 奧本海默控股的機構持有比例爲36%

Every investor in Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (NYSE:OPY) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 44% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

任何奧本海默控股股票(NYSE:OPY)的投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。擁有44%股份,個人內部人員在公司中擁有最多的股份。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 8.0% gain.

因此,內部人士成爲上週8.0%漲幅中最大的受益者。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Oppenheimer Holdings.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於奧本海默控股的什麼。

big
NYSE:OPY Ownership Breakdown December 3rd 2024
紐交所:OPY所有權分佈2024年12月3日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Oppenheimer Holdings?

機構持股對奧本海默控股的意義是什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Oppenheimer Holdings already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Oppenheimer Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

奧本海默控股已經有機構在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司擁有一個可觀的股份。 這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,而且他們很喜歡。 但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯。 如果多個機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看奧本海默控股的下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:OPY Earnings and Revenue Growth December 3rd 2024
紐交所:OPY2024年12月3日收益和營業收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Oppenheimer Holdings. With a 33% stake, CEO Albert Lowenthal is the largest shareholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.6% and 4.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對奧本海默控股來說,對沖基金沒有太多股份。CEO阿爾伯特·洛文塔爾擁有33%的股份,是最大的股東。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的8.6%和4.9%。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 51% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示了這樣一個事實:大約51%的公司由前4個股東控制,這表明這些所有者在業務上擁有重大影響力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但考慮到分析師的看法,了解風向也是有意義的。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此它可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Oppenheimer Holdings

奧本海默控股的內部股權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.. Insiders have a US$278m stake in this US$638m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們的資料顯示,內部人士在奧本海默控股公司持有大量股票。內部人員在這家總價值63800萬美元的公司中持有27800萬美元的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以點擊這裏查看他們是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Oppenheimer Holdings. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

作爲佔有20%股份的所有者,大衆投資者,主要是個人投資者,對奧本海默控股公司具有一定程度的影響力。雖然這個群體不能直接決定,但確實對公司的運行產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Oppenheimer Holdings that you should be aware of.

儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經確定了奧本海默控股存在2個警示信號,您需要注意。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論